2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2022.101560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of machine learning prediction model for post-rehabilitation functional outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 ML has been applied to predict outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage. [8][9][10] In a study by Wang et al 8 with 333 patients, an overall accuracy of 83.9%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 72.5%, and 90.6% were achieved using the RF model in predicting 6 month outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. In a retrospective study by Guo et al, 9 ML-based models slightly outperformed traditional statistical analysis and the ICH score in prediction of mortality.…”
Section: Results and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…12 ML has been applied to predict outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage. [8][9][10] In a study by Wang et al 8 with 333 patients, an overall accuracy of 83.9%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 72.5%, and 90.6% were achieved using the RF model in predicting 6 month outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. In a retrospective study by Guo et al, 9 ML-based models slightly outperformed traditional statistical analysis and the ICH score in prediction of mortality.…”
Section: Results and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML-based models have also been use to predict hematoma expansion and outcome from CT images of patients with a high degree of accuracy. 10, 34, 35 The strength of our model is the prediction of individual patient mRs using unlike the discussed models which classifies outcome as good, poor, or dead. A recent meta-analysis has demonstrated that ML models have better predictive performance when compared to standard statistical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Decisions can be made using the random forest (RF) method, which averages many nodes. It is possible to classify and segment images using a convolutional neural network (CNN), which has several layers and nodes [4]. Each of these algorithms has been previously detailed in technical detail [5], but no agreement has developed to guide the selection of specifc algorithms for clinical use in cardiovascular medicine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%