2018
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1407327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of Personality Disorder Spectra Scales for the MMPI–2–RF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(106 reference statements)
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MMPI-2-RF can be scored using data from the MMPI-2 (Tarescavage, Alosco, Ben-Porath, Wood, & Luna-Jones, 2014), and this latter version was administered to all participants upon intake to the programme. The BPD spectra scale has shown very good internal consistency reliability and promising construct validity, including very large correlations (rs > .70) with other well-validated measures of BPD (Brown & Sellbom, 2019;Sellbom et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-restructured Form (Mmpi-2-mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The MMPI-2-RF can be scored using data from the MMPI-2 (Tarescavage, Alosco, Ben-Porath, Wood, & Luna-Jones, 2014), and this latter version was administered to all participants upon intake to the programme. The BPD spectra scale has shown very good internal consistency reliability and promising construct validity, including very large correlations (rs > .70) with other well-validated measures of BPD (Brown & Sellbom, 2019;Sellbom et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-restructured Form (Mmpi-2-mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…BPD has also been conceptualised from the perspective of an Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD), which is meant to address several challenges with the traditional personality disorder diagnostic system. While the formal DSM-5 personality disorder model considers traditional categorical diagnoses (one either has the disorder or does not), a general consensus has emerged among most personality disorder (PD) researchers that PDs are best conceptualized using dimensional personality traits (Hopwood et al, 2018). The limitations of categorical PD models are well recognized, and include high co-morbidity (with the majority of patients who are diagnosed with a PD meeting criteria for more than one) (Livesley, 2003;Zimmerman et al, 2005), extreme heterogeneity among individuals with the same PD diagnosis, lack of empirical evidence for PD categories (Eaton, Krueger, South, Simms, & Clark, 2011), temporal instability of diagnoses (M. T. Shea et al, 2002), and arbitrary distinctions between normal personality, abnormal traits, and clear disorders (Widiger & Trull, 2007).…”
Section: Dsm-5 Alternative Model For Personality Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations