2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method for quantification of Efavirenz in Efavirenz-Enfuvirtide co-loaded polymer-lipid hybrid nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plotting the peak areas vs. concentration gave a high correlation coefficient value of 0.995. However, the correlation coefficient is no longer sufficient for determining linearity, according to the literature [16][17][18]. It is suggested to evaluate the fit of the ordinary least squares linear regression by assessing the homoscedasticity of data and, in the case of heteroscedasticity search for other models, which better defined the correlation between the concentration and the response of the detector [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plotting the peak areas vs. concentration gave a high correlation coefficient value of 0.995. However, the correlation coefficient is no longer sufficient for determining linearity, according to the literature [16][17][18]. It is suggested to evaluate the fit of the ordinary least squares linear regression by assessing the homoscedasticity of data and, in the case of heteroscedasticity search for other models, which better defined the correlation between the concentration and the response of the detector [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) for each analyte ( 1 , A , B , C , and D ) were calculated based on the standard deviation of the response and the slope of the calibration curve, generated from six replicate analysis applying the formula 1 [ 23 ]: where k is the factor related to the level of confidence ( k = 3.3 and 10 for LOD and LOQ respectively), SD Sa is the standard deviation of the intercept, and S b is the slope.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) for each analyte (1, A, B, C, and D) were calculated based on the standard deviation of the response and the slope of the calibration curve, generated from six replicate analysis applying the formula 1 [23]:…”
Section: Limit Of Detection and Limit Of Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robustness of method was evaluated by deliberate variation in chromatographic conditions including analytical instrument, wavelength, pH, mobile phase composition, column oven temperature and flow rate [28]. The robustness of the developed technique was evaluated by altering mobile phase ratio and flow rate.…”
Section: Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%