Development and Validation of Software CRISIS to Perform Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment with Emphasis on the Recent CRISIS2015

Abstract

How to citeComplete issue More information about this article Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative

A probabilistic approach for seismic risk assessment based on vulnerability functions. Application to Barcelona

“…For the operational implementation of the VIM_P two codes are recommended: CRISIS and USERISK. The different versions of code CRISIS have been widely validated to perform PSHA (Aguilar et al, 2017). The code USERISK was developed since 2011 exclusively to compute seismic risk according to the VIM_P, and it has been successfully applied for this purpose (Aguilar, 2011).…”

“…In the VIM it is possible to determine a seismic hazard scenario performing a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA), which is based mainly on the approach of Cornell and Esteva (Cornell, 1968;Esteva, 1970). For this purpose, CRISIS99 (Ordaz et al, 1999;Aguilar, 2001;Ordaz et al, 2013;Aguilar et al, 2017) was selected as the standard code of the Risk-UE project to perform a PSHA (Faccioli et al, 2003). Particularly, the results of seismic hazard that can be computed by CRISIS99 are, for instance, annual frequencies of exceedances of PGA.…”

“…It is important to mention that nowadays the recent versions of CRISIS as CRISIS2015 or R-CRISIS Aguilar et al, 2017;ERN, 2017) allows applying two procedures to determine curves of frequencies of exceedance of macroseismic intensities. The first procedure is the same that was mentioned previously for CRISIS99 and the second procedure consists in to perform a PSHA in terms of macroseismic intensities Aguilar et al, 2017), to obtain directly a curve of macroseismic intensities versus exceedance rates. Currently, both procedures are valid, and the selection of the procedure depends on different factors as the data available, the attenuation relationships available, etc.…”

“…We perform a PSHA of Barcelona applying CRISIS2015 Aguilar et al, 2017) directly in terms of macroseismic intensities. For this purpose, we considered the seismic sources of Figure 17 .…”

An Integrated Computational Approach for Seismic Risk Assessment of Individual Buildings

“…Hazard Module Vulnerability Module Exposure Module GIS Output Results AFAD-RED [22]  1    ARMAGEDOM [23]  1,2  3,4  6  CAPRA+CRISIS [24,25]  1,2   5,6  CEDIM [19,26]  1,2  3  5,6  ER2-Earthquake [27]  1,2  4  6  ELER [19,28]  1  3,4  6  EPEDAT [29]  1  3  6  EQRM [19,30]  1,2   5,6  HAZUS [31]  1,2  4  5,6  InaSAFE [32]    5  KOERILoss [33]  1,2  4  6  LNECLoss [19,34]  1  3,4  6  MAEViz [19,35]  1,2   5  MDLA [36]  1,2  4  ?  OpenQuake [37]  1,2  3  6  QLARM [38]  1   6  QuakeIST [39]  1  3,4  5,6  RiskScape [19,40]  1  3  5,6  SEISMOCARE [41]  2  4  5  SELENA [42]  1,2  4  5,6  SLA-IES [43]  1  4  5  1 Deterministic; 2 probabilistic; 3 empirical methods; 4 mechanical methods; 5 individual units; 6 group units.…”