2020
DOI: 10.1177/1040638720947199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of SYBR Green- and probe-based reverse-transcription real-time PCR assays for detection of the S and M segments of Schmallenberg virus

Abstract: Schmallenberg virus (SBV), discovered in Germany in 2011, causes congenital malformations in ruminants. Reverse-transcription real-time PCR (RT-rtPCR) assays based on various segments of SBV have been developed for molecular detection. We developed alternative RT-rtPCR assays for SBV detection to avoid earlier reported mutations and hypervariable regions of the S and M segments of the viral genome. For SYBR Green-based detection of the S segment, the R2 value and efficiency of the developed assay were 0.99 and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such variation is, however, likely due to within animal tissue specificity/tropism and mutation; it is not reflected in circulating viruses where selection pressure to maintain transmissibility in multiple mammalian and insect hosts is high 36 . The performance for the S segment in the assay compared with the M gene assays was similar 35 . Consequently, it seems unlikely that qPCR assay mismatches were responsible for the failure to detect SBV in ram semen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such variation is, however, likely due to within animal tissue specificity/tropism and mutation; it is not reflected in circulating viruses where selection pressure to maintain transmissibility in multiple mammalian and insect hosts is high 36 . The performance for the S segment in the assay compared with the M gene assays was similar 35 . Consequently, it seems unlikely that qPCR assay mismatches were responsible for the failure to detect SBV in ram semen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“… 36 The performance for the S segment in the assay compared with the M gene assays was similar. 35 Consequently, it seems unlikely that qPCR assay mismatches were responsible for the failure to detect SBV in ram semen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the RNA samples were retrotranscribed using a commercial kit (iScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kit, BioRad). For the reaction mix (20 µL), 2 µL of template, 2× SYBR Green I master mix, and a final concentration of 500 nM of each primer (forward primer 5’ CAGGATGTCAGGATATCTAG 3’ and reverse primer 5’ TCCCTTAACCTCAGCAA 3’) were used [ 52 ]. A reference strain was used as positive control (SBV-BH80/11–4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%