2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12671-011-0082-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

23
85
3
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
23
85
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This instrument was derived using a joint factor analysis of existing mindfulness measures and comprises the following five factors: observing experiences (e.g., When I take a shower or a bath, I stay alert to the sensations of water on my body), acting with awareness (e.g., I am easily distracted [reversed]), describing or labeling experiences (e.g., I can usually describe how I feel at the moment in considerable detail), not judging experiences (e.g., Usually when I have distressing thoughts or images, I judge myself as good or bad, depending what the thought/image is about [reversed]), and being non-reactive to inner experiences (e.g., I watch my feelings without getting lost in them). Sugiura et al (2012) constructed the Japanese version and confirmed that it had comparable psychometric properties to the original version. Specifically, the factor structure was replicated, the total score and subscales had acceptable to good internal consistency, and the mindfulness facets were positively correlated with adaptive psychological traits, indicating acceptable construct validity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This instrument was derived using a joint factor analysis of existing mindfulness measures and comprises the following five factors: observing experiences (e.g., When I take a shower or a bath, I stay alert to the sensations of water on my body), acting with awareness (e.g., I am easily distracted [reversed]), describing or labeling experiences (e.g., I can usually describe how I feel at the moment in considerable detail), not judging experiences (e.g., Usually when I have distressing thoughts or images, I judge myself as good or bad, depending what the thought/image is about [reversed]), and being non-reactive to inner experiences (e.g., I watch my feelings without getting lost in them). Sugiura et al (2012) constructed the Japanese version and confirmed that it had comparable psychometric properties to the original version. Specifically, the factor structure was replicated, the total score and subscales had acceptable to good internal consistency, and the mindfulness facets were positively correlated with adaptive psychological traits, indicating acceptable construct validity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Versions of this instrument have been validated in both non-clinical and clinical samples (Baer, Smith, Hopkins, Krietemeyer, & Toney, 2006; Curtiss & Klemanski, 2014a). The FFMQ was also validated in a Japanese sample and exhibited good psychometric properties (Sugiura, Sato, Ito, & Murakami, 2012). In the current sample, good reliability was obtained for both the observation (α = 0.82) and nonreaction (α = 0.79) subscales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice for the FFMQ was based on the review of the scientific literature, once this instrument is one of the most cited measures to assess mindfulness (Sauer et al, 2013). In addition, the FFMQ was adapted and validated in at least six countries to date being able to measure levels of mindfulness in a wide range of populations with or without meditation experience (Baer et al, 2008;Cebolla et al, 2012;Dundas, Vøllestad, Binder & Sivertsen, 2013;Hou, Wong, Lo, Mak, & Ma, 2013;Sugiura, Sato, Ito, & Murakami, 2012;Tran, Glück, & Nader, 2013;Veehof, Klooster, Taal, Westerhof, & Bohlmeijer, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%