2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-016-9943-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the modular Feed-code method for qualitative and quantitative determination of feed botanical composition

Abstract: The analysis of feed composition in terms of ingredients is addressed by Regulation (EC) 767/2009 and is important for detecting economic fraud and for monitoring feed safety. Within the framework of the EU project Feed-code, we developed and internally validated a modular assay, relying on intron polymorphism, for the complete qualitative analysis of the botanical composition of feed and the quantitative determination of six target plant species. Main performance parameters of each module, such as applicabili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On general terms and with reference to the species studied, noncompliance to the declared composition was found for almost all feed samples, independently of the methodology used (end-point PCR/ Taqman assays). Unconformities to the label were also detected using TBP methodology applied to feed analysis [ 11 ]. Errors or counterfeits related either to missing ingredients, declared in the label but actually absent (flax in CPR-X10 and sunflower in CPR-X13) or, most often, to the presence of non-declared species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On general terms and with reference to the species studied, noncompliance to the declared composition was found for almost all feed samples, independently of the methodology used (end-point PCR/ Taqman assays). Unconformities to the label were also detected using TBP methodology applied to feed analysis [ 11 ]. Errors or counterfeits related either to missing ingredients, declared in the label but actually absent (flax in CPR-X10 and sunflower in CPR-X13) or, most often, to the presence of non-declared species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Feed-Code project, “Animal feed certification instrument and procedure to guarantee the quality of meat and dairy products through automatic, simple and rapid DNA barcode method based on tubulin-based polymorphism (TBP)", financed under the EU FP7 Capacities program, took up the challenge and worked out an effective control system that can properly address the issues raised by the different EC regulations reported above. The TBP (Tubulin-Based-Polymorphism) molecular marker is applied to feed analysis resulting in an easy and efficient DNA profiling of the different botanical species that are actually present in any given feed sample [ 11 ]. Here it is shown that AOX-based methodology, initially proposed for validation of the TBP method in the framework of the Feed-Code project, defines an additional suitable molecular marker approach to ascertain plant species composition of animal feed samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Successful applications of TBP have been demonstrated in fields as diverse as genomic profiling within diverse botanical groups, such as grasses (Eleusine indica, Phalaris arundinacea, Poa trivialis, etc. ), ornamentals (Rosa spp) and trees [21,22]; parental identification, hybrid origin recognition and genetic relationships reconstruction [23]; ploidy level characterization [24]; qualitative and quantitative determinations of plant ingredients in feed [25]. Nevertheless, TBP as method for plant genotyping remains only occasionally utilized by the scientific community [26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%