2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the technology adoption propensity (TAP) index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Examining individual personal propensities in explaining the use of digital technologies has recently received an increasing amount of interest in various research settings [6,21,26,28]. Our results indeed show that B2B customers' personality play a role in the behavioral intention of customer toward using digital services.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Examining individual personal propensities in explaining the use of digital technologies has recently received an increasing amount of interest in various research settings [6,21,26,28]. Our results indeed show that B2B customers' personality play a role in the behavioral intention of customer toward using digital services.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Previous research suggests that correspondence between an evaluative object and one's self-concept is likely to elicit positive attitudinal responses (Kotler 1965;Sirgy 1982;Mehta 1999;Xue and Phelps 2013). Relative to the current study, one's identification as a technology-oriented person has been previously identified as a positive and powerful determinant of attitudes toward emergent/new technologies (e.g., Ratchford and Barnhart 2012;Ferreira, da Rocha, and da Silva 2014). Accordingly, we surmised that it was important to control for variance associated with positive evaluations of the ARA environment for reasons related to maintenance of one's self-concept as the type of person who is up-to date with new technologies (e.g., Liljander, Gillberg, Gummerus, and Van Riel 2006;Straub 2009).…”
Section: Perceived Technological Self-conceptmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…This observation, probably related to the already observed skepticisms of some rehabilitative members in respect of robotic therapy, 15 was out of study focus, but it could suggest to focus further studies also on psychologic features of rehabilitative staff, such as the propensity to adopt new technologies, as already suggested in other fields. 33 Moreover, the small sample size leading to the small subgroups of subjects could also affect the results of this study, although it was designed in accordance with previous similar literature. 10,13,34 It limited the possibility of including all factors in the regression analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%