2018
DOI: 10.1177/0276236618794880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of the Retrospective Childhood Fantasy Play Scale

Abstract: The current article describes the development and initial psychometric properties of the Retrospective Childhood Fantasy Play Scale (RCFPS), a brief 11 item retrospective self-report measure of preference for, and engagement with, fantasy play during childhood. Five studies were conducted to: (1) develop the initial items for the scale (n=77), (2) determine the underlying factor structure (n =200), (3) test the fit of the model (n =530), and (4) & (5) ascertain construct validity (n =200) and (n =263). Overall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these new measures are much broader than the CEQ or ICMI because they cover the entire range of fantasy engagement, including its beneficial effects on, for example, problem solving, creativity, and recreational activities (e.g., the Imaginative Involvement Scale; Naylor & Simonds, 2015; the Fantasy Engagement Scale, Plante et al, 2017; the Fantasy Questionnaire, Weibel et al, 2018). Others are narrower than the ICMI or CEQ in that they focus on specific aspects of fantasy proneness, such as imaginary companions and pretend play during childhood (e.g., the Retrospective Childhood Fantasy Play Scale; Kirkham et al, 2019). However, as these scales are fairly recent, researchers have not yet employed them on a wide scale, and little is known about how they relate to other indices (e.g., measures of schizotypy or dissociation).…”
Section: Measures Of Fantasy Pronenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these new measures are much broader than the CEQ or ICMI because they cover the entire range of fantasy engagement, including its beneficial effects on, for example, problem solving, creativity, and recreational activities (e.g., the Imaginative Involvement Scale; Naylor & Simonds, 2015; the Fantasy Engagement Scale, Plante et al, 2017; the Fantasy Questionnaire, Weibel et al, 2018). Others are narrower than the ICMI or CEQ in that they focus on specific aspects of fantasy proneness, such as imaginary companions and pretend play during childhood (e.g., the Retrospective Childhood Fantasy Play Scale; Kirkham et al, 2019). However, as these scales are fairly recent, researchers have not yet employed them on a wide scale, and little is known about how they relate to other indices (e.g., measures of schizotypy or dissociation).…”
Section: Measures Of Fantasy Pronenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the domain of therapy, next research might shed light on the effect of saudade on the subjective well-being among lonely people. Researches examining the relationships between saudade and connectedness, inspiration, fantasy (Kirkham et al, 2019), and creativity (Geher et al, 2017) are currently ongoing.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Retrospective Childhood Fantasy Play Scale (Kirkham et al, 2019) is a self-report scale consisting of 11 items, examining participants' engagement and preference towards FP as a child. Participants indicated their agreement with statements on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from (1) strongly disagree to (5) strongly agree.…”
Section: The Retrospective Childhood Fantasy Play Scalementioning
confidence: 99%