2018
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awy280
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Infant Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rodent models have shown that neuropathy is reversible upon reduction of PMP22 mRNA levels, as was shown in transgenic mice that overexpressed PMP22 through an inducible promoter. 5,6 However, given that neuropathy is slowly progressive, there is a clear need for sensitive biomarkers that measure disease progression and target engagement in patients. 3 Although it remains to be seen whether reversibility can be expected in CMT1A patients, therapeutic approaches are currently being developed to decrease PMP22 expression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rodent models have shown that neuropathy is reversible upon reduction of PMP22 mRNA levels, as was shown in transgenic mice that overexpressed PMP22 through an inducible promoter. 5,6 However, given that neuropathy is slowly progressive, there is a clear need for sensitive biomarkers that measure disease progression and target engagement in patients. 3 Although it remains to be seen whether reversibility can be expected in CMT1A patients, therapeutic approaches are currently being developed to decrease PMP22 expression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Clinical outcome assessments, such as the Rasch modified CMT Neuropathy or Exam Scores (CMTNS-R/ CMTES-R), measure severity of neuropathy in adults and children with CMT1A. 5,6 However, given that neuropathy is slowly progressive, there is a clear need for sensitive biomarkers that measure disease progression and target engagement in patients. Recent studies have tested for biomarkers of disease impairment and/or progression in CMT1A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross‐sectional design of our study might be inadequate to explore the effect of age on CMTNS2, and the inclusion of pediatric CMT patients or a larger number of those ≥50 years might have yielded different results. We excluded pediatric CMT patients because of the scarcity of information of normative CSA values in patients under the age of 16 years and the limited sensitivity of the CMTNS2 in children; other clinical scales are more appropriate . Previous data on pediatric CMT1A suggested a correlation between CSA and clinical scores, but with potential bias effect of age …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…75 Similar advances have also been made in pediatric cohorts with the development and validation of reliable and sensitive scales such as the CMT pediatric and CMT infant scales, crucial for monitoring of early-onset phenotypes. 76,77 In addition, objective biomarkers for monitoring disease progression and disability have also been developed and applied in clinical trials. Serum neurofilament light chain has been identified as a promising biomarker of disease activity, correlating with both disease severity and the validated CMT clinical scores.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%