Development and Validation of the Inventory of Perceptions of Medication Administration Errors for Nurses in Taiwan

Kao, Chia‐Chan; Lin, Yu-Hua; Lee, I; Sun, Fan‐Ko; Chang, Tzu-Chun; Li, Hsiu-Ping

doi:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000048

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Six of the seven quantitative studies used descriptive correlational study methods (Chard, 2010; Kao et al, 2015; Karga et al, 2011; Lewis et al, 2015; Meurier et al, 1997; Quillivan et al, 2016). One used purely descriptive methods (Taifoori & Valiee, 2015).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One quantitative study explicity used medication errors as the type of nursing error (Kao et al, 2015). Five quantitative studies allowed the nurse to decide what constituted the error of significance in their nursing practice (Chard, 2010; Karga et al, 2011; Lewis et al, 2015; Quillivan et al, 2016; Taifoori & Valiee, 2015).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Karga et al (2011) then modified Meurier’s tool. Kao and colleagues (2015) created the Inventory for Perceptions of Medication Administration Errors in Taiwan. Lastly, Quillivan et al (2016) used the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool, which measures both personal and organizational outcomes.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Next, we read entire articles to further rule out evidence that, when further scrutinized, had not met earlier inclusion or exclusion criteria. Limiting studies to those with nurse‐only samples, 21 articles were identified (Arndt, 1994; Chard, 2010; Coli et al, 2010; Crigger & Meek, 2007; de Freitas et al, 2011; Delacroix, 2017; Jones & Treiber, 2010; Kable, Kelly, & Adams, 2018; Kao et al, 2015; Karga, Kiekkas, Aretha, & Lemonidou, 2011; Lewis, Baernholdt, Guofen, & Guterbock, 2015; Maiden, Georges, & Connelly, 2011; Meurier, Vincent, & Parmar, 1997; Quillivan, Burlison, Browne, Scott, & Hoffman, 2016; Rassin et al, 2005; Santos et al, 2007; Schelbred & Nord, 2007; Taifoori & Valiee, 2015; Treiber & Jones, 2010, 2018a, 2018b).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Critical Review: Moral Injury in Nurses in the Aftermath of a Patient Safety Incident

Stovall

Hansen

Ryn

2020

J of Nursing Scholarship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background To date, there has been no published work towards understanding or classifying patient safety incidents (PSIs) or their aftermath as potential morally injurious experiences (pMIEs). A morally injurious experience is one that violates deeply held moral values and beliefs, and can put an individual at risk for burnout, post‐traumatic stress disorder, and other trauma‐related problems. This can also set the stage for moral injury, which can occur when there has been a betrayal of what is right by someone in a position of legitimate authority, or by one’s self, in a high‐stakes situation. Objective The objective of this review of nurse second victim literature is to describe symptoms of moral injury empirically observed in nurses in the aftermath of a PSI. Methods A critical review using a SALSA (search, appraisal, synthesis, analysis) method commenced with a search of electronic data base–indexed original evidence between 1980 and December 2018, focusing on registered nurses involved with a PSI. Results The nurse empirical literature reviewed included qualitative (n = 10), quantitative (n = 7), and mixed‐methods (n = 4) studies (total n = 21). Core moral injury symptoms included guilt (67%), shame (71%), spiritual‐existential crisis (9%), and loss of trust (52%). Secondary symptoms of moral injury included depression (33%), anxiety (57%), anger (71%), self‐harm, (19%), and social problems (48%). Implications Moral injury better describes what historically has been called the nurse second victim phenomenon. Through identification of pMIEs and symptoms of moral injury, nurses and organizations can be empowered to advance training and intervention programs addressing pMIEs that affect nurses’ safety and retention in the aftermath of a PSI. Clinical Relevance By describing the experiences associated with a PSI as potentially morally injurious, we set the stage to describe the potential consequences associated with the aftermath of the PSI. Furthermore, this language avoids victimizing those involved by more accurately reflecting the pMIEs of the aftermath.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Critical Review: Moral Injury in Nurses in the Aftermath of a Patient Safety Incident

Stovall

Hansen

Ryn

2020

J of Nursing Scholarship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is, therefore, obvious that hospital supervisors should assist nurses with a clear and transparent plan for dealing with nursing MEs, which will aid all concerned. [28] Also, using various high-tech equipment, such as mobile device app or computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system, have developed to reduce ME due to inaccessible time to drug delivery or workload-caused fatigue in medical staffs. [29,30] There were some limitations in this cross-sectional study design.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlation between psychophysiological response and hospital management model for nurses involved in medication errors

Li¹,

Yin²,

Liu³

et al. 2017

JNEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because hospitals in Taiwan now place a lot of emphasis on hospital accreditation, leading to a heavy workload for nurses, nurses are unintentional involved in patient medication errors (MEs). In this research, we explore the possible correlation between psychophysiological responses of nursing staff and a hospital management model regarding MEs. We conducted a cross-sectional study design in one hospital in central Taiwan. A total of 345 nurses at Tali Jen-Ai Hospital l were selected. A questionnaire was chosen as the study instrument. The questionnaire asked the following information: basic data, classification of MEs, frequency and severity of psychophysiological responses, and information about the hospital's management model and support system. We found that the hospital management model had a significant negative correlation with the frequency of physiological symptoms (r = -0.14, p < .01). Likewise, the support system also had a substantial negative correlation with the scores of the physiological symptom, behavioral responses, and psychophysiological responses. Using multiple regression analysis adjusted for work duration, job title, and degree of injury, we found that the support system was significantly correlated with the nurses' psychophysiological responses. Both the hospital management and the support system decreased the psychophysiological responses of the nurses. Therefore, we recommend that supervisors implement a management strategy to deal specifically with MEs. When nurse managers have frequently empathy and no-blame attitude to replace disrespectful or skeptical ways to nurse with ME, they will empower their enthusiasm and responsibility to improve the reduction of ME.

show abstract

Refusing to report the medication errors observed in Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences during 2014–2015

Geravandi¹,

Sahebalzamani

Moghadam

et al. 2019

Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was evaluation of effects of healthcare reform on refusing the medication errors report by nurses of educational hospital affiliated to Ahvaz Jundishapur University of medical sciences during 2014-2015. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Razi, Golestan and Emam teaching hospital of Ahvaz (a tertiary-care hospital) in the southwest of Iran. The present study was a cross-sectional study. Data about the demographic characteristics and reasons not reporting medication errors from three main educational hospital of Ahvaz were collected. Results: After processing data, the results showed 61% of medication errors report by them. Based on our result, the highest reason for refusing the medication errors observed because of fear from reporting consequences. The results of the present study showed that the most important reasons for refusing the medication errors report by nurses were related to factors related to the fear of the consequences of reporting 3.72 ± 1.532, factors related to the process of reporting were 3.50 ± 0.753 and the managerial factors 3.12 ± 1.286, respectively. Conclusion: Regarding the etiology of medication errors, Escherichia coli were the most frequent pathogen. The finding of this study showed that the encouraging hospital managers to give a positive response to them, encouraging nurses to reporting errors without any stress and paying attention to local standards can be reduce number of medication errors.

show abstract

Development and Validation of the Inventory of Perceptions of Medication Administration Errors for Nurses in Taiwan

Abstract: The IPMAE is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring perceptions of MAE occurring among nurses. Nursing directors may use the results generated by the IPMAE to help reduce the negative consequences of MAE events among nurses.

Cited by 6 publications

References 15 publications

A Critical Review: Moral Injury in Nurses in the Aftermath of a Patient Safety Incident

A Critical Review: Moral Injury in Nurses in the Aftermath of a Patient Safety Incident

Correlation between psychophysiological response and hospital management model for nurses involved in medication errors

Refusing to report the medication errors observed in Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences during 2014–2015

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About