2020
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.190757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the Cambridge Multimorbidity Score

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Health services have failed to respond to the pressures of multimorbidity. Improved measures of multimorbidity are needed for conducting research, planning services and allocating resources. METHODS: We modelled the association between 37 morbidities and 3 key outcomes (primary care consultations, unplanned hospital admission, death) at 1 and 5 years. We extracted development (n = 300 000) and validation (n = 150 000) samples from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. We constructed a general… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
136
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
136
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, across most age and multimorbidity count strata the estimated YLL per person remained substantial and generally above 5 years. This means that even after accounting for multimorbidity count, most individuals lost considerably more than the "1-2 years" suggested by some commentators 23 perhaps reflecting the high prevalence of multimorbidity in this population, especially in those over the age of 50 years 24,25 . Finally, whilst the YLL remained high across most age-and multimorbidity count strata, the presence of multimorbidity did indeed influence the magnitude of the YLL.…”
Section: Summary Of Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Third, across most age and multimorbidity count strata the estimated YLL per person remained substantial and generally above 5 years. This means that even after accounting for multimorbidity count, most individuals lost considerably more than the "1-2 years" suggested by some commentators 23 perhaps reflecting the high prevalence of multimorbidity in this population, especially in those over the age of 50 years 24,25 . Finally, whilst the YLL remained high across most age-and multimorbidity count strata, the presence of multimorbidity did indeed influence the magnitude of the YLL.…”
Section: Summary Of Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These conditions included atrial fibrillation, alcohol problem, anxiety, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, diabetes, epilepsy, heart failure, hearing loss, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, Parkinson’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and transient ischemic attack. The codes for each condition were developed as part of a project developing the Cambridge Multimorbidity Score[ 21 ] and are publicly available on the website: http://www.phpc.cam.ac.uk/pcu/cprd_cam/codelists/ . We used number of consultations within 365 days before index stroke as a measure of healthcare utilization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no agreed way of how to measure multimorbidity: Some researchers classify multimorbidity by how many disorders occur together, while others look for systematic clusters among co-occurring problems. What problems are counted in one of these clusters also varies, some researchers consider only a handful of chronic disorders as constitutive of multimorbidity (Dugravot et al 2020), while others capture dozens of conditions (Payne et al 2020). Multimorbidity overlaps with other constructs, such as frailty (Hanlon et al 2018) and disability (Stineman et al 2012).…”
Section: Uncovering Multimorbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2020), while others capture dozens of conditions (Payne et al. 2020). Multimorbidity overlaps with other constructs, such as frailty (Hanlon et al.…”
Section: Uncovering Multimorbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%