2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2011.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the Compensatory Eating and Behaviors in Response to Alcohol Consumption Scale (CEBRACS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, future research should attempt to improve the validity of measures of drunkorexia, perhaps by employing more objective, behavioral assessments of drunkorexia in real time, or through the utilization of self-report measures that are more comprehensive than the single-item measure used in the present study. 25 Conclusions Drunkorexia is prevalent on college campuses and puts students, particularly women, at increased risk for negative alcohol-related consequences above and beyond drinking itself. 2 The current study demonstrated that women are more likely than men to engage in this behavior because of their heightened weight control motivations, which suggests that an important point for intervention is addressing and reducing women's weight concerns.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, future research should attempt to improve the validity of measures of drunkorexia, perhaps by employing more objective, behavioral assessments of drunkorexia in real time, or through the utilization of self-report measures that are more comprehensive than the single-item measure used in the present study. 25 Conclusions Drunkorexia is prevalent on college campuses and puts students, particularly women, at increased risk for negative alcohol-related consequences above and beyond drinking itself. 2 The current study demonstrated that women are more likely than men to engage in this behavior because of their heightened weight control motivations, which suggests that an important point for intervention is addressing and reducing women's weight concerns.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of these two problematic behaviours, involving the use of disordered eating in direct response to saving calories for alcohol use, was first described anecdotally by the media as "drunkorexia," reflecting a new phenomena endorsed by university students in Western countries (Cofsky, 2012). Among the few empirical studies that have investigated the phenomena of drunkorexia, it has been most consistently characterised as "the use of dietary restriction, exercise, self-induced purging, and other extreme weight-control behaviours, specifically to offset the calories anticipated or ingested from drinking alcohol" (Barry & Piazza-Gardner, 2012;Peralta, 2002;Rahal, Bryant, Darkes, Menzel, & Thompson, 2012). However, beyond the claims of these few studies, the understanding of drunkorexia is in its infancy, with no clear conceptualisation or agreement within the literature over what the phenomenon of drunkorexia actually is.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collective Cronbach's alpha level for the scale was α = .89, with each of the subscales ranging from α = .79 -.95. The CEBRACS also exhibited adequate convergent validity with small to medium correlational effect sizes for a drive for thinness, body dissatisfaction, and bulimic behaviors (Rahal, et al 2012). The CEBRACS demonstrated sufficient discriminant validity through a nonsignificant relationship with the Global Belief in a Just World Scale (Lipkus, 1991).…”
Section: The Compensatory Eating Behaviors In Response To Alcohol Conmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…All of the subscales of the CEBRACS except for bulimia were significantly and positively related to each of the AUDIT subscales and binge drinking behaviors. Binge drinking and alcohol frequency were correlates used in the standardization of the CEBRACS (see Rahal et al, 2012), but to date the CEBRACS has not been used in concomitance with the AUDIT and opioid use assessment in a clinical sample. The AUDIT consistently had a significant relationship with the CEBRACS which may have added meaningful support for the translation and convergent validity of the CEBRACS even though psychometric support for the CEBRACS was not an intent of the study.…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation