Development and validation of the interpersonal communication assessment tool for assessing the interpersonal communication skills of public health midwives

Abstract

Background Interpersonal Communication Skills (IPCS) are one of the core clinical skills that should be developed by the Public Health Midwives (PHMs), who are grass-root level public healthcare providers in primary healthcare settings in Sri Lanka. This study aimed to develop and validate the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Tool (IPCAT), an observational rating scale, to assess the IPCS of PHMs. Methods Item generation, item reduction, instrument drafting, and development of the tool’s rating guide were made by an expert panel. A cross-sectional study was conducted in five randomly selected Medical Officer of Health (MOH) areas, the smallest public health administrative division in the district of Colombo, Sri Lanka, to identify the factor structure, which is the correlational relationship between a number of variables in the tool. A sample of 164 PHMs was recruited. The data on IPCS were collected by video-recording the provider-client interaction using simulated clients. All recorded videos were rated by a rater using the drafted IPCAT, which included a Likert scale of 1(poor) to 5 (excellent). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted using the Principal Axis Factoring extraction method and the Varimax rotation technique to explore the factors. Three independent raters were used to rate ten randomly selected videos to assess the tool’s internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. Results The IPCAT obtained a five-factor model with 22 items, and all five factors explained 65% of the total variance. The resulting factors were “Engaging” (six items on making rapport), “Delivering” (four items on paying respect), “Questioning” (four items on asking questions), “Responding” (four items on empathy), and “Ending” (four items to assess the skills of ending a conversation productively). The internal consistency, Cronbach’s Alpha value, for all five factors was above 0.8, and the inter-rater reliability (ICC) was excellent (0.95). Conclusions The Interpersonal Communication Assessment Tool is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the interpersonal communication skills of Public Health Midwives. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registry, Sri Lanka. Ref No, SLCTR/2020/006(February 4th,2020)

Problem-based learning analysis in strengthening college students’ interpersonal communication skill

“…Understanding such signals functions as an umbrella for people as they fulfil their obligations as proficient interpersonal speakers. The researchers modified interpersonal communication indicators derived from multiple investigations conducted by [34]- [36], as shown in this Table 4.…”

Utilizing Effective Communication in Interactions with Same-Age Peers: Children Aged 4-5 Years

“…Early Childhood Education (ECE) stands as one type of exchange program tailored for children from birth to 18 years old (Smith et al, 2023). This is implemented through the provision of stimulating education to support the overall development of children, encompassing physical and mental aspects, ensuring they acquire the necessary skills to continue their education (Prasanna et al, 2023). The organization of early childhood education emphasizes laying the foundation for physical growth, intellectual development, socio-emotional skills, language and communication, and spirituality, tailored to the unique developmental stages of young children (Kayiran & Sönmez, 2020).…”

Integrating Project-Based Learning in Preparing Students' Interpersonal Communication Skills on Speaking Courses in Indonesia

“…Direct (face-to-face) communication requires speakers to adhere to communication ethics and comprehension of these indicators serves as a guide for speakers as they carry out their responsibilities as competent interpersonal communicators. The researchers adopt interpersonal communication skill indicators derived from http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter several studies conducted by Abdurrahman (2018),Prasanna et al (2023), andTadesse (2021), as shown in Table4.…”