2017
DOI: 10.1108/bjm-01-2017-0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the team influence relations scale (TIReS)

Abstract: Purpose-Past research about workplace promotion has focussed on factors that shape employees' perceptions for promotion. Yet, we still know little about how such undesirable factors as the fear of success (henceforth FoS) syndrome and perceived workplace discrimination affect perceived promotion and even less so how this relationship is mediated by self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. The purpose of this paper is to propose a conceptual framework integrating these factors. Design/methodology/approach-A stru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 271 publications
(587 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The term “ collective communication ” is a particular group-related communication style, which refers to a group’s (or team’s) behavior and does not necessarily correlate with individual communication ( Kozusznik et al, 2018 ), although it may vary from the sum of individual factors ( Woolley et al, 2010 ). Collective communication can be described as the connections among people, feedbacks, and interrelations ( Weick and Roberts, 1993 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term “ collective communication ” is a particular group-related communication style, which refers to a group’s (or team’s) behavior and does not necessarily correlate with individual communication ( Kozusznik et al, 2018 ), although it may vary from the sum of individual factors ( Woolley et al, 2010 ). Collective communication can be described as the connections among people, feedbacks, and interrelations ( Weick and Roberts, 1993 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a lower perceived level of directiveness goes with a higher perception of effectiveness in building relationships. Contrariwise, DEI stems from cooperative orientation and entails goal attainment at a group level (Kożusznik et al, 2018). Because the execution of a managerial role requires choosing organizational goals over personal ones, and cooperation requires positive relationships, we expect a negative correlation between directiveness and DEI (H 9).…”
Section: Study 3: Personality and Influencementioning
confidence: 94%
“…We conceptualize influence regulation as the ability to regulate one’s influence in the workplace in order to adequately fulfil the requirements of a situation, which—similarly to PsyCap—is changeable, i.e., can be developed and trained [ 26 ]. Because influence regulation particularly refers to influence withdrawal [ 27 ], those who regulate their influence can remain silent even though they could take part in a conversation, wait through a break in a conversation, abstain from commenting, and can diminish their importance in a conversation [ 26 , 27 ]. Also, people who regulate their influence arrange space for others to show their contribution.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, people who regulate their influence arrange space for others to show their contribution. Hence, they protect those who speak from verbal attacks, keep eye contact with an interlocutor, and approve of other people’s ideas [ 27 ]. If there is an individual or team that can effectively manage the situation and obtain better results [ 27 ], influence regulation allows the influence to be shared, thus making it possible to profoundly use the knowledge and skills of this team member or the team as a whole [ 28 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation