2003
DOI: 10.1037/0033-3204.40.4.278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of the Self-Awareness and Management Strategies (SAMS) Scales for Therapists.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The self‐awareness and management subscales are internally consistent (.76 and .73, respectively). The measure has good internal consistency (.73 to .76) and demonstrated good convergent/discriminant validity when compared with the Self‐Monitoring Scale (Snyder, ) as well as a satisfactory reliability coefficient (Williams et al, ). In short, SAMS was designed to assess the degree to which counsellors in training feel compromised by the distracting self‐awareness of their own thoughts, posture, anxiety and any other elements that might interfere with conducting a session.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self‐awareness and management subscales are internally consistent (.76 and .73, respectively). The measure has good internal consistency (.73 to .76) and demonstrated good convergent/discriminant validity when compared with the Self‐Monitoring Scale (Snyder, ) as well as a satisfactory reliability coefficient (Williams et al, ). In short, SAMS was designed to assess the degree to which counsellors in training feel compromised by the distracting self‐awareness of their own thoughts, posture, anxiety and any other elements that might interfere with conducting a session.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…re-focusing on the client, thought suppression). The SAMS was demonstrated to have good internal consistency and convergent validity with the Self-Monitoring Scale (Snyder, 1974), as well as satisfactory reliability (Williams et al, 2003).…”
Section: Self-awareness and Management Strategies Scales For Therapismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The SAMS (Williams, Hurley, O'Brien, & De Gregorio, 2003) is a 33-item Likert-type scale with a range of 1 (never) to 5 (always) that assesses the presence of disruptive internal experiences or obstacles that interfere with the clinician when he or she is conducting a therapy session. The SAMS has two subscales: Hindering Self-awareness (e.g.…”
Section: Self-awareness and Management Strategies Scales For Therapismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only existing measure of hindering self-awareness per se, the Self-Awareness and Management Strategies Scales (SAMS), focuses on measuring hindering self-awareness in session (Williams, Hurley, O'Brien, & DeGregorio, 2003). Since we were working with prepracticum trainees, who were not yet meeting with clients, we selected the Rumination subscale of the Reflection Rumination Questionnaire as a measure of hindering self-awareness instead.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%