2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index score was notably low, especially among the male population (Table ). Currently, further disease activity scores have been specifically developed for patients with FFA such as the Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Index (FFASI) score and the Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) . These scores include additional scoring for the extent of alopecia based on hairline recession and body area involvement and have however been criticized for being too complex (FFASI) and lacking trichoscopic evaluation of disease activity (FFASS) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index score was notably low, especially among the male population (Table ). Currently, further disease activity scores have been specifically developed for patients with FFA such as the Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Index (FFASI) score and the Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) . These scores include additional scoring for the extent of alopecia based on hairline recession and body area involvement and have however been criticized for being too complex (FFASI) and lacking trichoscopic evaluation of disease activity (FFASS) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this score assessed for internal and external validity, comprehended less clinical parameters and lacked trichoscopic evaluation, important to improve the appraisal of inflammation. 32 In recent past, the trichoscopic visual scale demonstrated a strong correlation between severity of follicular hyperkeratosis at trichoscopy. 35…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…31 However, soon was criticized based on its subjective features and the similarities with LPP exclusively in histology. 32 Then, the fibrosing alopecia severity index (FFASI) was proposed by Holmes at al including two major sections, A and B. FFASI-A employs clinical images of the hairline, divided into four sections. Alopecia severity is then ranked 1-5 based on hairline recession.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Index (FFASI) score developed by Holmes et al comprises measurement of hairline alopecia and notes the presence of hair loss elsewhere (face and body), plus other disease features including scalp LPP and facial papules [ 62 ]. The Frontal Fibrosing the Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) proposed by Saceda-Corralo et al is based on the evaluation of severity and extent of frontal and temporal hairline recession, eyebrow loss, perifollicular erythema and hyperkeratosis, pruritus and pain associated with FFA [ 63 ].…”
Section: Diagnostics and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%