1999
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14a08.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire

Abstract: The 32-item Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) has shown good responsiveness, reliability and construct validity; properties that are essential for use in clinical trials, clinical practice and surveys. However, to meet the needs of large clinical trials and long-term monitoring, where efficiency may take precedent over precision of measurement, the 15-item self-administered MiniAQLQ has been developed.The MiniAQLQ was tested in a 9-week observational study of 40 adults with symptomatic asthma. Patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
562
0
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 665 publications
(580 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(24 reference statements)
7
562
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, a higher ATAQ score (more control problems) was associated with lower quality of life in subjects with asthma, indicated by generic and diseasespecific quality of life measures, such as the SF-36, the standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, 12 and the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. 55,68 Furthermore, a strong correlation and similar performance were reported between the ATAQ and the ACT at home and in clinical settings (r ϭ Ϫ0.73). 25,69,70 …”
Section: Validitysupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, a higher ATAQ score (more control problems) was associated with lower quality of life in subjects with asthma, indicated by generic and diseasespecific quality of life measures, such as the SF-36, the standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, 12 and the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. 55,68 Furthermore, a strong correlation and similar performance were reported between the ATAQ and the ACT at home and in clinical settings (r ϭ Ϫ0.73). 25,69,70 …”
Section: Validitysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…40 The ACQ has been validated for use as a self-administered tool in-person, at home, or by telephone. 40 Moderate to strong correlations resulted from comparing the ACQ with the AQLQ (r ϭ 0.76), 54 Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (r ϭ 0.72 and 0.74), 55 the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) (r ϭ 0.19 -0.55), 56 and the ACT (r ϭ Ϫ0.82 to Ϫ0.89). 13,14,19 The correlations between the ACQ and the shortened versions were high (r ϭ 0.87 with ACQ-5, 0.98 with ACQ6a, and 0.92 with ACQ-6b).…”
Section: Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objective complementary examinations for the diagnosis of GERD at follow‐up were not performed. Spanish‐validated versions of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) 21, the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) 22, and the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ) 23 were used to assess daytime sleepiness, asthma control, and asthma‐related quality of life, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Asthma Control Questionnaire, (ACQ) 9 ) and asthma-related health status in adults (e.g. the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, (AQLQ) 10 ) and in children (e.g. the Paediatric Caregivers Quality-of-life Questionnaire (PQLQ) 11 ) in the context of clinical trials, the usefulness of these tools in C o p y r i g h t G…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%