DOI: 10.31274/etd-180810-4858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of virtual interactive tasks for an aviation English assessment

Abstract: for their time, support, motivation, and help whenever necessary in every step of my academic journey. My sincere appreciation is extended to the military air traffic controllers in Korea for expressing their enthusiasm for and willingness to participate in this research. Very special thanks go to CSM Jewon Ryu in the 55 th Air Traffic Service Battalion, who helped me in various ways in both the pilot study and dissertation study. I also extend my thanks to Dr. Byeong-Young Cho at University of Pittsburgh for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be clear that (a) accomplishing this kind of task is not a reasonable expectation for most language learners, but (b) for those who expect to use language in high-stakes settings like that of air traffic or marine communication, task-based assessments of this sort are probably essential for tapping into the likelihood of a candidate's abilities to use the language on the job (Alderson, 2009). Indeed, according to the International Civil Aviation Organization PRICE Study Group (2007), “Because of the high stakes involved, pilots and controllers deserve to be tested in a context similar to that in which they work and test content should therefore be relevant to their roles in the work-place.” For this reason, task-based assessments have been developed to replicate the demands of these and similar high-stakes professional environments that require language use under very specific circumstances (for one recent example of a task-based assessment for aviation English, see Park, 2015).…”
Section: Task-based Language Assessment In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be clear that (a) accomplishing this kind of task is not a reasonable expectation for most language learners, but (b) for those who expect to use language in high-stakes settings like that of air traffic or marine communication, task-based assessments of this sort are probably essential for tapping into the likelihood of a candidate's abilities to use the language on the job (Alderson, 2009). Indeed, according to the International Civil Aviation Organization PRICE Study Group (2007), “Because of the high stakes involved, pilots and controllers deserve to be tested in a context similar to that in which they work and test content should therefore be relevant to their roles in the work-place.” For this reason, task-based assessments have been developed to replicate the demands of these and similar high-stakes professional environments that require language use under very specific circumstances (for one recent example of a task-based assessment for aviation English, see Park, 2015).…”
Section: Task-based Language Assessment In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last two decades, the argument-based approach to validation has been used in many studies in the field of language assessment (e.g., Chapelle et al, 2008Chapelle et al, , 2015Chapelle et al, , 2018Frost, Elder, & Wigglesworth, 2012;LaFlair & Staples, 2017;Li, 2015;Llosa, 2008;Park, 2015;Yan & Staples, 2019;Youn, 2015). These studies indicate the usefulness of the "conceptual tools"…”
Section: Language Assessment Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question was addressed by analyzing holistic scores assigned to the oral task responses of 30 test takers by three raters using the rating scale. Interrater reliability of the scores was estimated using a two-way mixed average measure intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for absolute agreement (Shrout & Fleiss, 1979;McGraw & Wong, 1996), as in other studies on L2 oral assessment (e.g., Lee, 2015;Park, 2015). Among different types of ICC, this type was chosen for the study because (a) the same set of raters rated all task responses, (b) raters involved in the analysis were the only raters of interest (i.e., not randomly selected from a large population), (c) the mean of ratings by multiple raters is used as the basis of the assessment, and (d) the absolute agreement among raters is of importance (Shrout & Fleiss, 1979;McGraw & Wong, 1996).…”
Section: Rq3: Rater Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Kim and Elder (2015) surveyed Korean airline pilots and air traffic controllers through 400 questionnaires and 22 interviews to elicit the underlying construct of both English proficiency tests for pilot and air traffic controller radiotelephony communication. Similarly, benefitting from his military service experience, Park (2015) surveyed and interviewed 20 military air traffic controllers to define the construct of Aviation English and elicit test tasks for his virtual Aviation English assessment. In the domain of English for Health Professionals, researchers recruit the involvement of different stakeholders to help understand the underlying construct in several studies (e.g., Davidson, 2021;Macqueen et al, 2016;Pill & McNamara, 2016).…”
Section: Identification Of Test Tasks In Esp Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECD has been successfully used in several research studies that develop and investigate innovative test tasks (e.g., Banerjee, 2019;Choi, 2018;Lee, 2015;Park, 2015). In this dissertation study, an ECD framework was used to provide a solid foundation for test design and development based on Mislevy et al (2003).…”
Section: Evidence-centered Designmentioning
confidence: 99%