Development and validity of a questionnaire to test the knowledge of primary care personnel regarding nutrition in obese adolescents

Abstract

BackgroundIn light of its epidemic proportions in developed and developing countries, obesity is considered a serious public health issue. In order to increase knowledge concerning the ability of health care professionals in caring for obese adolescents and adopt more efficient preventive and control measures, a questionnaire was developed and validated to assess non-dietitian health professionals regarding their Knowledge of Nutrition in Obese Adolescents (KNOA).MethodsThe development and evaluation of a questionnaire to assess the knowledge of primary care practitioners with respect to nutrition in obese adolescents was carried out in five phases, as follows: 1) definition of study dimensions 2) development of 42 questions and preliminary evaluation of the questionnaire by a panel of experts; 3) characterization and selection of primary care practitioners (35 dietitians and 265 non-dietitians) and measurement of questionnaire criteria by contrasting the responses of dietitians and non-dietitians; 4) reliability assessment by question exclusion based on item difficulty (too easy and too difficult for non-dietitian practitioners), item discrimination, internal consistency and reproducibility index determination; and 5) scoring the completed questionnaires.ResultsDietitians obtained higher scores than non-dietitians (Mann–Whitney U test, P < 0.05), confirming the validity of the questionnaire criteria. Items were discriminated by correlating the score for each item with the total score, using a minimum of 0.2 as a correlation coefficient cutoff value. Item difficulty was controlled by excluding questions answered correctly by more than 90% of the non-dietitian subjects (too easy) or by less than 10% of them (too difficult). The final questionnaire contained 26 of the original 42 questions, increasing Cronbach’s α value from 0.788 to 0.807. Test-retest agreement between respondents was classified as good to very good (Kappa test, >0.60).ConclusionThe KNOA questionnaire developed for primary care practitioners is a valid, consistent and suitable instrument that can be applied over time, making it a promising tool for developing and guiding public health policies.

Development and validation of a nutrition knowledge questionnaire for a Canadian population

“…Although test–retest reliability was significant for the questionnaire, the Pearson’s r value obtained was not particularly high, at 0·59, compared with other studies ( 10 , 36 , 37 ) . However, the time interval between both completions was longer than observed in other studies, where generally two weeks separated completions ( 10 – 12 , 36 – 38 ) . In the present study, due to constraint linked with the context of the study, the time interval varied from 15 to 110 d. According to the literature, more than two weeks could be enough to modify nutrition knowledge due to the constant flow of information in this domain ( 22 ) .…”

Domestic violence on children: development and validation of an instrument to evaluate knowledge of health professionals

“…In construct validation , the dimensions of the items of the instrument of this study, must be simultaneously evaluated, as the internal coherence decreases when they are individually analyzed, and the value of Cronbach's α indicates a positive association when a larger number of issues is associated. Similar results were obtained in the survey conducted by Pinho and collaborators 26 . The criteria validity showed significance when the time since completion of education and the time working in the FHS, according to the knowledge, were analyzed, as the performance of the research subject and actual behavior are related.…”

“…Similar results were obtained in the survey conducted by Pinho and collaborators 26 . The criteria validity showed significance when the time since completion of education and the time working in the FHS, according to the knowledge, were analyzed, as the performance of the research subject and actual behavior are related.…”

Development of a validated questionnaire to measure the self-perceived competence of primary health professionals in providing nutrition care to patients with chronic disease

“…The questionnaire development comprised four stages as displayed in Figure 1 (4) Test-retest reliability. A similar process has been previously undertaken by others to validate nutrition-related questionnaires (12,13). The study was approved by the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference number AHS/22/14/HREC).…”