2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00234.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and verification of saphenous, tibial and common peroneal nerve block techniques for analgesia below the thigh in the nonchondrodystrophoid dog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study evaluating the radial, ulnar, median and musculocutaneous nerve blocks showed greater successful staining of the nerves in cadavers compared to the clinical success rates on live dogs (Trumpatori et al 2010). This was also observed in two studies of the pelvic limbs in dogs, which showed that successful staining of nerves at post-mortem did not correspond to clinical efficacy (Rasmussen et al 2006a and2006b). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…A previous study evaluating the radial, ulnar, median and musculocutaneous nerve blocks showed greater successful staining of the nerves in cadavers compared to the clinical success rates on live dogs (Trumpatori et al 2010). This was also observed in two studies of the pelvic limbs in dogs, which showed that successful staining of nerves at post-mortem did not correspond to clinical efficacy (Rasmussen et al 2006a and2006b). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This dose of bupivacaine is not sufficient to cause neuronal degeneration, given the exposure time and injection method (Foster and Carlson, 1980). The method of injection is an adaptation previously described in dog where a perineural injection of bupivacaine was applied to the saphenous, tibial and common peroneal nerves for analgesia below the thigh (Rasmussen et al, 2006), the injection sites were adjusted for use in rats. The four experimental groups were as follows: saline perineural pre-injection with saline injected into the paw (saline control); saline perineural preinjection with λ-carrageenan injected into the paw (CIP group); bupivacaine perineural preinjection with saline injected into the paw (nociceptive inhibition control); bupivacaine perineural pre-injection, with λ-carrageenan injected into the paw (nociception inhibited CIP group).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was approved by the University of Minnesota Animal Care and Use Committee and written, informed client consent was obtained for each patient. Chondrodystrophoid dogs were excluded because of the poor technical success of the injection protocol in these breeds (Rasmussen et al. in press).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bupivacaine 0.4 mL kg −1 (Sensorcaine 0.5%; Astra USA, Inc., Westborough, MA, USA) or sterile, preservative‐free saline (equivalent volume) was administered (Fig. 1) (Rasmussen et al. in press) to the study leg by one investigator (LFG) unaware of the study group designation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%