2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, application, and comparison of hybrid meta-heuristics for urban land-use allocation optimization: Tabu search, genetic, GRASP, and simulated annealing algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous compatibility definition is slightly different from the definition given in (Mohammadi et al, 2016). In the previous definition, the geographic properties of the regions, such as lengths of lines that two regions share each other, are also considered.…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The previous compatibility definition is slightly different from the definition given in (Mohammadi et al, 2016). In the previous definition, the geographic properties of the regions, such as lengths of lines that two regions share each other, are also considered.…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our input defined in the previous paragraph are a particular case of the input of the LUOP in (Mohammadi et al, 2016). In that paper, instead of defining if there is a compatibility between two areas, they give a compatibility value between all pairs of areas.…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Land conversion in these plans occurs only to improve compactness. Compactness is one of the most important objectives considered in most related studies [17,26,27,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37], but landslide risk also needs to be reduced to some extent, because land use conversion is very costly. We have obtained 100 non-dominated plans of various weight combinations, but the range of plans that can actually be selected is narrow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban growth modeling is an important method of urban land‐use optimization, which is considered complicated because the decisions on land‐use allocation must be made with respect to not only what activities to select, but also how much land to allocate to each and where to allocate the land (Cao et al, ; Cao, ). Thus far, many optimization algorithms have been employed to deal with land‐use optimization problems, for example: the Tabu search algorithm (Qi, Altinakar, Vieira, & Alidaee, ), simulated annealing algorithm (Santé‐Riveira, Boullón‐Magán, Crecente‐Maseda, & Miranda‐Barrós, ), genetic algorithm (Cao et al, ; Cao & Ye, ; Li & Parrott, ), particle swarm optimization algorithm (Masoomi, Mesgari, & Hamrah, ), ant colony optimization algorithm (Liu, Li, Shi, Huang, & Liu, ), bee colony algorithm (Yang, Sun, Peng, Shao, & Chi, ), and hybridization of these algorithms (Mohammadi, Nastaran, & Sahebgharani, ). Spatial optimization methods in urban growth modeling are commonly based on the cellular automata (CA) model, which coincides with the complex theory in which macroscale and global patterns can be generated from the microscale by local interactions of individual cells (Almeida, Gleriani, Castejon, & Soares‐Filho, ; Cao, Huang, Li, & Li, ; Li, Liu, & Yu, ; Lin, Huang, Chen, & Huang, ; Liu et al, ; Li, Chen, Liu, Liang, & Wang, ; Liu, Liang, Li, Xu, & Ou, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%