2019
DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2017-41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, Implementation, and Clinician Adherence to a Standardized Assessment Toolkit for Sensorimotor Rehabilitation after Stroke

Abstract: Purpose: This study describes the development of a standardized assessment toolkit (SAT) and associated clinical database focusing on sensorimotor rehabilitation in three stroke rehabilitation units (SRUs). Implementation of the SAT was confirmed using objective measures of clinician adherence while exploring reasons for varied adherence. Method: Participants were patients post-stroke admitted for inpatient rehabilitation and clinicians from the three SRUs. A collaborative and iterative process was used to dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Predictors are most often assessed with standardized outcome measures, and from implementation research on stroke assessments ( 34 ), it is known that the willingness and ability to change are additionally hampered by the lack of familiarity with the assessments ( 31 , 34 ), having difficulty with changing routines ( 34 ), time and equipment needed to perform assessments ( 31 , 34 ), and the lack of support from the management staff or team members ( 31 ). Whether the assessment is performed is highly dependent on the inability of a patient to participate in the testing due to, for example, communication or cognitive deficits ( 31 , 35 ). Based on the available implementation literature, an approach to implement the EPOS model for independent gait would be initiated by therapists themselves, having support from the management staff, having a close collaboration between researchers who developed the model and clinicians, providing ongoing education and ‘teaching on the job,' and having directions on important treatment foci ( 33 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictors are most often assessed with standardized outcome measures, and from implementation research on stroke assessments ( 34 ), it is known that the willingness and ability to change are additionally hampered by the lack of familiarity with the assessments ( 31 , 34 ), having difficulty with changing routines ( 34 ), time and equipment needed to perform assessments ( 31 , 34 ), and the lack of support from the management staff or team members ( 31 ). Whether the assessment is performed is highly dependent on the inability of a patient to participate in the testing due to, for example, communication or cognitive deficits ( 31 , 35 ). Based on the available implementation literature, an approach to implement the EPOS model for independent gait would be initiated by therapists themselves, having support from the management staff, having a close collaboration between researchers who developed the model and clinicians, providing ongoing education and ‘teaching on the job,' and having directions on important treatment foci ( 33 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge translation interventions designed to facilitate guideline implementation in stroke rehabilitation to date have been costly, requiring funds to support and train local clinical facilitators or clinicians to enable practice change [14,[18][19][20]. Interventions have also targeted the implementation of multiple recommended practices simultaneously [14,19,21], making it challenging for stroke teams to prioritize practices [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the studies included in this review described toolkits targeting rehabilitation professionals or healthcare services for people post-stroke [23]. Nonetheless, individual tools [20] or toolkits [14,21] have been previously included in multi-component knowledge translation interventions targeting the implementation of best practices in stroke rehabilitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, more than 60% of the participants in our study treated people suffering from neurological and neurodegenerative disorders or worked in geriatrics assisting elderly people at risk of chronic disease or disability. In this respect, it is recognised that the field of neurology is an area where cognitive, physical, and functional aspects are assessed to a greater extent [ 28 , 29 ]. This may explain why functional assessments and instruments for measuring cognitive or motor impairment were reported in higher proportions by the occupational therapists who participated in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%