2021
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, implementation, and evaluation of a clinical decision support tool to improve naloxone coprescription within Military Health System pharmacies

Abstract: Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Within the MHS, the frequency of naloxone co-dispensing in individuals who met criteria for at least 1 of 4 risk indicators during the study period was 116 per 1000 individuals. Although our finding far exceeded previously published estimates in samples of Medicare Part D (4.6 per 1000) or commercially insured beneficiaries (5 per 1000), 14,31 the rate was still low. Predictive models based on the 2010-2018 data from several US Federal surveys projected a 15% reduction in opioid-related deaths if naloxone prescribing rates were to persist at current levels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…13 Within the MHS, the frequency of naloxone co-dispensing in individuals who met criteria for at least 1 of 4 risk indicators during the study period was 116 per 1000 individuals. Although our finding far exceeded previously published estimates in samples of Medicare Part D (4.6 per 1000) or commercially insured beneficiaries (5 per 1000), 14,31 the rate was still low. Predictive models based on the 2010-2018 data from several US Federal surveys projected a 15% reduction in opioid-related deaths if naloxone prescribing rates were to persist at current levels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…As such, the differences in prescribing rates across the different risk indicators may reflect differences in programming, dissemination efforts, and utilization of decision support tools by pharmacists, relative to opioid prescribing providers. 14 Descriptively, naloxone prescribing rates for patients who met the criteria for LOT, elevated MEDD, and elevated RIOSORD exceeded 20% by the end of the study period, whereas naloxone prescribing rates for patients coprescribed benzodiazepines did not surpass 12%. During the Department of Defense OEND program implementation, some prescribers have questioned the utility of prescribing naloxone for patients who receive a 1-day supply of benzodiazepine that overlaps with a postprocedural opioid prescription (eg, refractory surgery and vasectomies).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As such, the differences in prescribing rates across the different risk indicators may reflect differences in programming, dissemination efforts, and utilization of decision support tools by pharmacists, relative to opioid prescribing providers. 14…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations