Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Gas migration velocity impacts the planning of pressurized mud cap drilling (PMCD) as it plays a pivotal role in the selection of fluid volumes and logistics. A pilot-scale experimental investigation of gas migration under downhole conditions (up to 3,600 psi, 240°F) in water, oils, and low-density drilling fluids is presented. While bubble-rise phenomena have been studied at near atmospheric pressures, the experimental setup and measurement method for high-temperature, high-pressure gas migration is rare. Experiments were performed using three test apparatuses: two separate pressurized lengths of 3-inch pipe, one 10-ft long and the other 18-ft long, as well as a unique high-pressure, high-temperature rotating test section (RTS). The RTS is 10-ft long, having a 6 inch × 4 inch eccentric annular geometry with the inner pipe capable of rotation. The inclination of all test sections can be varied. Gas was injected from the bottom through either a 1/8-inch diameter pressurized-injection port or a liquid-gas swap mechanism i.e. zero-velocity injection. Gas migration was recorded using a camera system or gamma-ray densitometers (GRDs). Some of the key results and insights from the testing are: (1) the gas migration rate and bubble length decrease with an increase in pressure, (2) the gas migration rate is higher in inclined vs. vertical sections, (3) bubble breakup occurs as pressure increases and interfacial tension decreases, (4) the inclination of the fluid column delays bubble breakup, and (5) high viscosity hinders bubble breakup. A key observation from the testing was that Taylor bubbles that may form during the initial phase of gas entering the annulus are likely to break up under downhole conditions of high pressure, low interfacial tension, and typical field mud viscosities, resulting in much lower gas migration rates during PMCD than the commonly used industry correlations. Another observation was that the practical length limitation of the test articles prevents us from observing the full evolution of gas bubble breakup. The results seen here are in line with our previous simulation work (Samdani et al., 2021, 2022).
Gas migration velocity impacts the planning of pressurized mud cap drilling (PMCD) as it plays a pivotal role in the selection of fluid volumes and logistics. A pilot-scale experimental investigation of gas migration under downhole conditions (up to 3,600 psi, 240°F) in water, oils, and low-density drilling fluids is presented. While bubble-rise phenomena have been studied at near atmospheric pressures, the experimental setup and measurement method for high-temperature, high-pressure gas migration is rare. Experiments were performed using three test apparatuses: two separate pressurized lengths of 3-inch pipe, one 10-ft long and the other 18-ft long, as well as a unique high-pressure, high-temperature rotating test section (RTS). The RTS is 10-ft long, having a 6 inch × 4 inch eccentric annular geometry with the inner pipe capable of rotation. The inclination of all test sections can be varied. Gas was injected from the bottom through either a 1/8-inch diameter pressurized-injection port or a liquid-gas swap mechanism i.e. zero-velocity injection. Gas migration was recorded using a camera system or gamma-ray densitometers (GRDs). Some of the key results and insights from the testing are: (1) the gas migration rate and bubble length decrease with an increase in pressure, (2) the gas migration rate is higher in inclined vs. vertical sections, (3) bubble breakup occurs as pressure increases and interfacial tension decreases, (4) the inclination of the fluid column delays bubble breakup, and (5) high viscosity hinders bubble breakup. A key observation from the testing was that Taylor bubbles that may form during the initial phase of gas entering the annulus are likely to break up under downhole conditions of high pressure, low interfacial tension, and typical field mud viscosities, resulting in much lower gas migration rates during PMCD than the commonly used industry correlations. Another observation was that the practical length limitation of the test articles prevents us from observing the full evolution of gas bubble breakup. The results seen here are in line with our previous simulation work (Samdani et al., 2021, 2022).
Light density drilling fluids with hollow glass beads (HGB) are growing in applications for drilling depleted formations with minimal losses and increasing rate of penetration. However, there is a lack of studies on how best to utilize typical solids control equipment, as current practices and procedures based on barite weighted muds are inefficient. We report a systematic full-scale test program to study and optimize solids control efficiency with shale shaker, hydrocyclone and centrifuge with such fluids. A non-aqueous-based hollow glass bead drilling fluid was formulated in the lab and a large batch (>40bbl) was prepared and tested using field scale solids control equipment. The inlet and effluent streams were monitored for density, particle size distribution, retort, rheology, and rheological properties and evaluated to determine the optimal equipment conditions to maximize solids control efficiency while minimizing loss of beads in the discharge stream. Variables included shaker screen sizes, flow rates and deck angles, hydrocyclone flowrates and operating pressures, centrifuge flowrates, differential speeds and other parameters. The amount of glass beads in the fluid was also varied. The drilling fluid was contaminated with a variety of sized solids which mimic drill solids. Based on the data gathered, effective procedures were developed for monitoring hollow glass beads and drill solids in each stream. Through the systematic test program, conditions could be identified to achieve high solids control efficiency from the shale shaker, the hydrocyclone, and the centrifuge. This was achieved at hollow glass beads concentrations of around 11% and 22% by volume. While some previous field experiences had indicated severe challenges with centrifuge usage with these fluids, effective centrifuge operation could be demonstrated once the proper settings were identified. Overall, the testing results showed that most of the drill solids can be removed using conventional solids control equipment and fluid properties (e.g. rheology, fluid loss, etc.) can be maintained at desired levels without the loss of any significant amount of beads with the discharged solids. Since the beads are lighter than base oil, their behavior in the solids control equipment is quite different from conventional solids. As such, equipment procedures and conventional settings had to be updated or changed. It was demonstrated that high solids control efficiency can be achieved even at high bead concentrations. This work addresses a barrier in the field application of these fluids and points towards practices that allow optimizing the application by minimizing drilling fluid dilution.
This paper describes the methods developed for testing and qualification of novel lightweight drilling fluids (foams, glass-bead fluids) using a unique pilot-scale test facility (PSTF). The performance criteria included fluid stability, rheology, pressure transmission, and gas migration under downhole conditions. Test results demonstrating the methods developed are provided, along with the capabilities of the facility, custom fixtures, and equipment that were built to study the performance of these fluids. A set of performance criteria and testing requirements were initially developed, which were then used to design and fabricate a novel pilot facility. The PSTF could generate downhole drilling conditions of 7,500 psig and temperatures above 300°F. Three custom-instrumented test articles were built to simulate wellbore geometry; one 10-ft long and one 18-ft long, both with a 2.62-in ID. The third article had a 10-ft long 6-in × 4-in annulus, with the eccentric internal pipe capable of 100-rpm rotation to mimic the drill string. The test articles could incline up to 45° to simulate deviated wells. Gas could be injected, and its migration rate measured in static and countercurrent flow using a video camera with full-bore sight glass, and gamma-ray densitometers. Dedicated sections for foam generation, measuring density, rheology, pressure transmission, and fluid sampling and imaging were provided. Upon commissioning of the PSTF, a 1 1/2 year test program was successfully carried out using lightweight foams and hollow glass-bead fluids. Due to the novel nature of the tests, best practices and procedures were developed through experimentation to quantify static and dynamic fluid stability, gas migration, foam generation techniques, fluid imaging and characterization, pressure transmission, and rheology. A variety of measurement techniques and instrumentation were trialed in the test articles to determine the best methods for tracking gas migration. Experiments in the test articles yielded a large amount of performance data, including fluid stability over time at different temperature and pressure conditions, the impact of drill string rotation on fluid stability, migration velocities of gas bubbles (i.e., gas kicks) within the drilling fluids at stagnant and countercurrent flow conditions, and the impact of drill string rotation. Pressure transmission speeds were measured in the foam with varying gas fractions. Example datasets from the testing program are provided, along with detailed descriptions of the test methods. The methods and test facility used to study lightweight drilling fluids are unique to the authors’ knowledge. For the first time, drilling fluids were analyzed in an annulus with a rotating pipe at downhole conditions at a pilot scale, and fluid stability along with gas migration were studied. These provide for rigorous testing of lightweight drilling fluids; the application of these fluids is expected to increase with declining reservoir pressures in oil and gas fields.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.