2000
DOI: 10.1006/geno.2000.6270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a 1.4-Mb BAC/PAC Contig and Physical Map within the Critical Region for Complete X-Linked Congenital Stationary Night Blindness in Xp11.4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimal region for CSNB1 is defined by the crossovers seen in patients B1-2006 (distal limit), and P23.340.V.1 and P520.V.29 (proximal limit) from families B1, P23 and P520 (refs 12,28,29, respectively). The relative position of all markers was confirmed by hybrid and physical mapping 14 nucleotide changes in eight other families with complete CSNB are presumed missense mutations that in seven instances lead to the substitution of a conserved residue; four are predicted to change a conserved leucine codon to a glutamine or proline codon (Table 1, Figs 3b and 5d). In three additional families, we detected nucleotide insertions that we predict add either seven or three amino acids (Table 1, Figs 3a and 5d).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The minimal region for CSNB1 is defined by the crossovers seen in patients B1-2006 (distal limit), and P23.340.V.1 and P520.V.29 (proximal limit) from families B1, P23 and P520 (refs 12,28,29, respectively). The relative position of all markers was confirmed by hybrid and physical mapping 14 nucleotide changes in eight other families with complete CSNB are presumed missense mutations that in seven instances lead to the substitution of a conserved residue; four are predicted to change a conserved leucine codon to a glutamine or proline codon (Table 1, Figs 3b and 5d). In three additional families, we detected nucleotide insertions that we predict add either seven or three amino acids (Table 1, Figs 3a and 5d).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%