SAE Technical Paper Series 2003
DOI: 10.4271/2003-22-0020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Biofidelic Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ISO working group 2 developed specifications for a 3.5 kg child and a 4.5 kg adult headform (ISO, 2006, ISO, 2007. A new legform, FlexPLI (Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor), has been developed in Japan (Konosu and Tanahashi, 2003). In contrast to the WG17 legform it has a flexible tibia and femur measuring ligament elongation and tibia-bending moment, and has a knee design which allows new tests without part replacement.…”
Section: Component Test Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ISO working group 2 developed specifications for a 3.5 kg child and a 4.5 kg adult headform (ISO, 2006, ISO, 2007. A new legform, FlexPLI (Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor), has been developed in Japan (Konosu and Tanahashi, 2003). In contrast to the WG17 legform it has a flexible tibia and femur measuring ligament elongation and tibia-bending moment, and has a knee design which allows new tests without part replacement.…”
Section: Component Test Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T e physical properties match those of the 50 percentile male and both the thigh and lower leg are composed of flexible elements. Konosu and Tanahashi [17] detail the development of the FLEX PLI that includes component level testing of the thigh, lower leg, and knee.…”
Section: Jamnjari Flex Pli 2003mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pedestrian safety regulations, the subsystem test procedure using an isolated leg-form impactor (such as the Flex-PLI leg-form) is employed for evaluation of vehicle safety performance (C-______________________________ NCAP, 2018; Euro-NCAP, 2017; J-NCAP, 2014) [4], [5], [8]. However, the isolated leg-form impactor used in current NCAPs was developed based on the anthropometry of Westerners midsize adult male [9], [10], which may not represent the human body damage situation of Chinese given the big gap in lower limb anthropometry between Chinese and Westerners (e.g., knee height of 50th percentile Chinese adult male is 442 mm, while the data for U.S. is 493 mm) [6] and the significant influence of relative height of knee versus bumper on pedestrian lower limb injury risk observed from real world crashes [12]. This may suggest that the effectiveness of C-NCAP on forcing improvement of vehicle front-end design for pedestrian lower limb protection might be undoubted for Westerners, however it may not be equally effective for Chinese.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%