2005
DOI: 10.1038/laban0505-31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a body condition scoring system for nonhuman primates using Macaca mulatta as a model

Abstract: The nutritional status of individual monkeys in research projects is an important yet sometimes overlooked variable that complicates the interpretation of research findings. The authors offer a framework for scoring fatness and muscularity in a semiquantitative manner without special equipment and in a way that could easily be accomplished during a routine physical examination. Body condition scoring can be used to assess the health of individual animals as well as determine nutritional adequacy within groups … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dietary restrictions were approved by the veterinary staff, and body condition assessments were made every other week. Body scores were maintained at or above 2 on the Clingerman and Summers (2005) scale. Water was available ad libitum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dietary restrictions were approved by the veterinary staff, and body condition assessments were made every other week. Body scores were maintained at or above 2 on the Clingerman and Summers (2005) scale. Water was available ad libitum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animals were 5.5–6.5 years of age, weighed 11.5–14 kg at the start of the study and exhibited body condition scores (Clingerman and Summers, 2005) of 2.5–4.0 out of 5 at the nearest quarterly exam. Daily chow (LabDietÂź 5038, PMI Nutrition International, Richmond, IN, USA; 3.22 kcal of metabolizable energy (ME) per gram) allocations were determined by a power function (Taffe, 2004) fit to data provided in a National Research Council recommendation (NRC/NAS, 2003) and modified individually by the veterinary weight management plan.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animals were 6-10 years of age, weighed 8.5-15 kg at the start of the study and exhibited body condition scores (Clingerman and Summers, 2005) of 2.0-3.75 out of 5 at the nearest quarterly exam. Daily chow (160-248 g; LabDietÂź 5038, PMI Nutrition International, Richmond, IN, USA; 3.22 kcal of metabolizable energy (ME) per gram) allocations were determined by a power function (Taffe, 2004a,b) fit to data provided in a National Research Council recommendation (NRC/NAS, 2003) and modified individually by the veterinary weight management plan.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%