2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a bone nonunion in a noncritical segmental tibia defect model in sheep utilizing interlocking nail as an internal fixation system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A post-surgical lameness was determined within both groups which lasted longer in animals of the LAE442 alloy group. Lameness, to a varying extend was reported by different authors using sheep model on intramedullary nailing as well [65][66][67]. In comparison to current available literature the lameness within this study appears to be more pronounced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…A post-surgical lameness was determined within both groups which lasted longer in animals of the LAE442 alloy group. Lameness, to a varying extend was reported by different authors using sheep model on intramedullary nailing as well [65][66][67]. In comparison to current available literature the lameness within this study appears to be more pronounced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…In fact, in the present study, some bone callus formation evidences were found in the tibia where a reduction of defect size from 10 mm to about 5 mm occurred. This outcome is in agreement with the study by Lozada‐Gallegos et al (), where the formation of bone callus was observed at 6 weeks in a 5‐mm fracture gap despite the use of a silicone ring, although they did not find any contact between the edges of the osteotomy. Therefore, in a noncritical size defect, the gap dimension seems crucial for achieve a nonunion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, preclinical models used for bone nonunion research frequently do not meet these criteria. Current large animal models of atrophic nonunion involve either large segmental osseous defects (Christou, Oliver, Pelletier, & Walsh, ; Den Boer et al, ; Reichert et al, ) or the interposition of foreign materials to isolate the fracture from the surrounding soft tissues in order to prevent the normal healing processes (Lozada‐Gallegos et al, ; Oni, ). None of these models simulates the clinical situation where the gap defect is small enough for fracture healing, but some local biological processes prevent union (Einhorn, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have attributed the regenerative capacity of autografts to periosteum, which accounts for about 70% of bone and cartilage formation at the initiation of autograft healing [1, 2]. Periosteal stripping is known to be associated with a high incidence of bone nonunion, whereas preservation of periosteum or use of a periosteum tube graft significantly improves bone graft incorporation and bone defect reconstruction [3-5]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%