“…Reference rates of carbon stock accumulation have been compiled for many forest types (e.g., IPCC, 2006), but these do not typically distinguish between riparian and upland forests. Despite their relatively small spatial footprint, riparian forests will usually have more favorable growing conditions (e.g., soil moisture), and they may accumulate carbon stocks at a greater rate than upland forests (Matzek, Stella, & Ropion, 2018;Naiman, Decamps, & McClain, 2010;Sutfin, Wohl, & Dwire, 2016), contributing more to rapid carbon sequestration in the short-term. Further, riparian ecosystems are widely recognized to provide numerous ecosystem services (Daigneault, Eppink, & Lee, 2017;Naiman et al, 2010;O'Brien et al, 2017), having the potential to mitigate the effects of climate change (Capon et al, 2013), and being biodiversity hotspots that provide critical habitat for fish and wildlife (Knopf, Johnson, Rich, Samson, & Szaro, 1988;Naiman et al, 2010).…”