1979
DOI: 10.1287/inte.9.2pt2.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Comprehensive Land Use Plan by Means of a Multiple Objective Mathematical Programming Model

Abstract: An optimization model was developed which enabled Du Page County Planners to prepare a comprehensive land use plan that considers several objectives simultaneously and also satisfies constraints on desired growth patterns. The plan has been endorsed by several Homeowners Associations, interested citizens groups, and by the various municipalities which have jurisdiction over their individual cities. Thirty-one of the thirty-two municipalities have accepted the County's plan (revisions were asked on only 0.5 per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a planning process, this depends on what one assumes about the relative importance of different types of land use hplanners typically want to ensure that a given proportion of land is assigned to residential use, for example, and to ensure Beckman [6] . Later the optimization process was proposed in the context of rational urban planning [7,8] , as well as in architectonic design [9] . Recently new methods for the research of the global optimum such as genetic algorithm have been utilized in order to establish the set of effi cient alternatives in a multi-objective optimization [10,11] .…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a planning process, this depends on what one assumes about the relative importance of different types of land use hplanners typically want to ensure that a given proportion of land is assigned to residential use, for example, and to ensure Beckman [6] . Later the optimization process was proposed in the context of rational urban planning [7,8] , as well as in architectonic design [9] . Recently new methods for the research of the global optimum such as genetic algorithm have been utilized in order to establish the set of effi cient alternatives in a multi-objective optimization [10,11] .…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each element g ij of the matrix is the ratio: utility generated by the cell i in the cell jtotal utility generated in cell j by the whole set of cells, as in the following expression: (8) …”
Section: Convergence Of the Self-organized Dynamics With The Optimal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other similar models were built in the same period such as the Southern Wisconsin Regional Plan Model [16] and Britton Harris' Optimizing Model -a modification of the Herbert-Stevens model [17]. More applications ensued in the following decades up to the present [18,19,20,21,22]. In the following, the basic structure of a LP model is presented first and, then, details of its applications drawing on the published literature are offered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, MODA is useful in the determination of the optimum alternative when the alternatives are indefinite or unlimited. The use of MODA is widespread in a number of planning-related areas such as the definition of the optimum land allocation model (Bammi & Bammi, 1979;Gilbert et al, 1985;Chuvieco, 1993;Dokmeci et al, 1993;Grabaum & Meyer, 1998;Gabriel et al, 2006;Ligmann-Zielinska et al, 2008), site selection of urban social and technical infrastructure (Malczewski, 1991;Minor & Jacobs, 1994;Eastman et al, 1995;Maniezzo et al, 1998;Cheng et al, 2003), land allocation problems with a shape constraint such as compactness (Aerts & Heuvelink, 2002;Aerts et al, 2003); convexity and contiguity (Minor & Jacobs, 1994;Williams, 2003;Shirabe, 2005) and the environmental impact assessment (Malczewski et al, 1997). MODA is a design technique which determines the optimum solution or the best alternative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%