2014
DOI: 10.1111/xen.12125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a consensus protocol to quantify primate anti‐non‐Gal xenoreactive antibodies using pig aortic endothelial cells

Abstract: Scientists working in the field of xenotransplantation do not employ a uniform method to measure and report natural and induced antibody responses to non-Galα(1,3)Gal (non-Gal) epitopes. Such humoral responses are thought to be particularly pathogenic after transplantation of vascularized GalTKO pig organs and having a more uniform assay and reporting format would greatly facilitate comparisons between laboratories. Flow cytometry allows examination of antibody reactivity to intact antigens in their natural lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serum incubation for 30min has been the most common time used 3,1012,1437 . A uniform method to measure natural and induced antibody responses to nonGal epitopes was recommended in 2014 11 . In this study, differences in serum concentration affected antibody binding to nonGal antigens, which we have confirmed in our present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum incubation for 30min has been the most common time used 3,1012,1437 . A uniform method to measure natural and induced antibody responses to nonGal epitopes was recommended in 2014 11 . In this study, differences in serum concentration affected antibody binding to nonGal antigens, which we have confirmed in our present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(F) Macrophage infiltration and (G) natural killer (NK) cell infiltration were both significantly higher in GTKO NPIs than in AIs (P = .02 and P = .05, respectively) costimulation blockade generated a xenospecificIgM response, which was not prevented by our experimental regimen. Indeed, non-Gal natural antibodies exist,[43][44][45] and our findings may point to the need for immunosuppressive interventions addressing the initial immune activation and additional genetic modifications of porcine islets to minimize natural IgM binding to non-Gal xenoantigens. Screening for these antibodies and selecting…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Anti‐non‐Gal IgM and IgG levels were monitored pre‐transplant and then at twice‐weekly intervals post‐transplantation by flow cytometry using donor pig aortic endothelial cells, as reported previously . Pooled human sera were used to indicate “control” levels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%