1981
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.280310171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a correlation between the non-polar solubility parameter, refractive index and molecular structure. II. Aliphatic ethers and alcohols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of the solid−solid phase transition was observed for both solutes under study and was observed previously only for 2-methyl-1 H -imidazole 5 Molar Volume, V m , and Association Parameters for Alcohols V m (298.15 K)− Δ H alcoholcm 3 ·mol -1 a kJ·mol -1 K (298.15 K) 1-propanol 72.7 25.1 b 197 b 1-butanol 92.0 25.1 b 175 b 2-butanol 92.4 25.1 150 2-methyl-2-propanol 94.9 25.1 110 1-hexanol 125.3 25.1 c 120 c a From ref . b From ref .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The existence of the solid−solid phase transition was observed for both solutes under study and was observed previously only for 2-methyl-1 H -imidazole 5 Molar Volume, V m , and Association Parameters for Alcohols V m (298.15 K)− Δ H alcoholcm 3 ·mol -1 a kJ·mol -1 K (298.15 K) 1-propanol 72.7 25.1 b 197 b 1-butanol 92.0 25.1 b 175 b 2-butanol 92.4 25.1 150 2-methyl-2-propanol 94.9 25.1 110 1-hexanol 125.3 25.1 c 120 c a From ref . b From ref .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Thus, for instance Letcher and Govender 14 applied the method to mixtures of cyclic ethers with short alkanols, from methanol to propanol, and took n -heptane as the homomorph of the alkanol in every case. An additional problem is the disagreement found when reviewing as to the guidelines governing the selection of the apolar homomorph of a given molecule, , geometric considerations apart. Let us examine the simplest case, that of linear compounds.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a semiempirical relationship was proposed by Wingefors and Liljenzin , as δ d = K d n D 2 1 n D 2 + 2 ( 1 + a V m + b V m 2 ) g i j where K d , a , and b are the empirical constants relating to the molecular structures, and g ij is the structural parameters determined by the molecular structures (∑ g ij ∼ 0.92–1). Wingefors and Liljenzin confirmed the practicality of eq using the data of aliphatic hydrocarbons, ethers, and alcohols. , We noticed that the plot of δ d versus ( n D 2 – 1)/( n D 2 + 2) for each type of liquids shows a linear correlation (Figure S9, SI), with an R 2 of ∼0.861 for nonpolar liquids, ∼0.692 for polar liquids, and ∼0.772 for H-bonded liquids. Commonly, a / V m ≪ 1, b / V m 2 ≪ 1, and ∑ g ij ≈ 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some fundamental physical properties of substances such as the relative dielectric constant (ε r ), refractive index ( n D ), and density (ρ) are closely related to the intermolecular interactions, similar to the cases of γ and δ parameters. Therefore, there must exist some intrinsic correlations between the characteristic parameters (γ and δ) and the fundamental physical quantities (ε r , n D , and ρ) for substances. ,, Several empirical (or semiempirical) equations relating γ t , δ t , and δ d to ε r and n D have been proposed for liquids so far, but their accuracy and applicability are limited (see Results and Discussion). We noticed that almost all of the equations previously proposed do not involve density, an important physical quantity of substances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%