2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2020.164951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Deep Neural Network for the data analysis of the NeuLAND neutron detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some features like the number of hits and the total deposited energy depend only slightly on the physics lists used, and their distributions can be easily compared to the actual experimental distributions. For models that analyze individual patterns within the detector, e.g., the 3D-or LTSM networks, a high-quality emulation of the experimental data is vital, as the description of interactions in the detector can differ substantially between physics implementations [19]. However, new models can be developed in parallel to this task, and then retrained based on the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some features like the number of hits and the total deposited energy depend only slightly on the physics lists used, and their distributions can be easily compared to the actual experimental distributions. For models that analyze individual patterns within the detector, e.g., the 3D-or LTSM networks, a high-quality emulation of the experimental data is vital, as the description of interactions in the detector can differ substantially between physics implementations [19]. However, new models can be developed in parallel to this task, and then retrained based on the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interactions simulated in the Monte-Carlo codes are based on several different models and implementations, assembled into so-called physics lists. In other investigations, it was found that they introduce some uncertainty [19]. In this paper, we restrict the discussion to the QGSP INCLXX HP physics lists [20,21].…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%