2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a DEM taking account of neck increments caused by surface diffusion for sintering and application to analysis of the initial stage of sintering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the presence of secondary phase at a GB can influence positively or negatively its mobility, a phenomenon that can also be advantageously used to limit grain growth [3,11,12]. Recently, numerical modeling of sintering coupled with grain growth have been proposed through finite difference method [13], Monte Carlo (MC) model [14,15,16,17,18], phase field approach [19,20,21,22,23,24], finite element or meshed-based methods [25,26], Discrete Element Method (DEM) [27] or a combination of methods [28,29]. Due to the complexity of the representation of the shape and of the physics of sintering, these approaches are, with the exception of DEM, generally computationally limited to a few particles, rarely a few hundreds, and often in 2D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the presence of secondary phase at a GB can influence positively or negatively its mobility, a phenomenon that can also be advantageously used to limit grain growth [3,11,12]. Recently, numerical modeling of sintering coupled with grain growth have been proposed through finite difference method [13], Monte Carlo (MC) model [14,15,16,17,18], phase field approach [19,20,21,22,23,24], finite element or meshed-based methods [25,26], Discrete Element Method (DEM) [27] or a combination of methods [28,29]. Due to the complexity of the representation of the shape and of the physics of sintering, these approaches are, with the exception of DEM, generally computationally limited to a few particles, rarely a few hundreds, and often in 2D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational methods to understand sintering behavior have been developed using various models over the last three decades. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Various models, such as the Monte Carlo (MC) model, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] discrete element model (DEM), [23][24][25] phase field model (PFM), 26,27 finite element model (FEM), 28,29 and finite-calculation method, [30][31][32] have been developed and implemented. However, the available models have not yet sufficiently simulated the entire sintering process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the available models have not yet sufficiently simulated the entire sintering process. Furthermore, previous reports using DEM 24,25,33 for sintering and the related processes indicate that the inhomogeneity in compacts must be focused on to realize a better-sintered body. Therefore, a specific and appropriate simulation method should be selected for particular purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thanks to this enhancement of the particles contact model, it became possible to study sintering and postsintering residual stresses of parti-cles collections [33]. Due to its elegance and efficiency, the approach of Nosewicz et al got a lot of attention among the researchers: For instance, Iacobellis et al [34] used it to model sintering of ceramic composite materials (ZrB 2 -SiC), Matsuda [35] enhanced it with independent evaluation of the neck growth rate between two particles by means of the direct integration of the diffusion equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%