2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a full-scale testing methodology for benchmarking fire suppression systems for use in informal settlement dwellings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical simulations were carried out using the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS), a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation that has been utilized by various researchers to explore fire dynamics and fire spread [9, 11-14, 24, 26-30]. The model was built on a full-scale ISO 9705 room geometry, which accurately simulates an IS household and has been used by various writers [9,11,14,27,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. The house was subjected to varying wind speeds (1 m/s, 5 m/s, 10 m/s, 15 m/s, 20 m/s, and 25 m/s) and directions (side wind and back wind, relatively to the compartment opening placed at the front wall).Additionally, different compartment boundary characteristics (thermally-thin and thermally-thick) were considered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical simulations were carried out using the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS), a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation that has been utilized by various researchers to explore fire dynamics and fire spread [9, 11-14, 24, 26-30]. The model was built on a full-scale ISO 9705 room geometry, which accurately simulates an IS household and has been used by various writers [9,11,14,27,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. The house was subjected to varying wind speeds (1 m/s, 5 m/s, 10 m/s, 15 m/s, 20 m/s, and 25 m/s) and directions (side wind and back wind, relatively to the compartment opening placed at the front wall).Additionally, different compartment boundary characteristics (thermally-thin and thermally-thick) were considered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Moreover, in a recent study, it has been reported that the temperature of firefighters’ bunker gear outer shell, in a typical fire, may reach up to the order of 1000 K. 23 Exposure to flashover fire conditions, though not common, include the observation of upper layer temperature of ∼600°C or radiant heat flux at floor level of ∼20 kW m --2 . 49,50 Some of firefighting garments have shown to lose their strength even at lower heat flux of 10 kW m --2 . 9 McCarthy and Di Marzo 47 also observed that with intense heat flux (20 kW m --2 ) firefighter protective gear experiences degradation even at extreme short durations as 30-second exposure.…”
Section: Firefighter’s Thermal Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%