2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2333(01)00064-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a high throughput in vitro toxicity screen predictive of high acute in vivo toxic potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluorescence spectra of both forms of the probe show a maximum emission at 590 nm for resorufin and a negligible fluorescence for resazurin. In agreement with Maeda et al (27), we found that 570 nm is the optimal excitation wavelength of resorufin, although 530 nm is commonly used (5,15,28,29).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The fluorescence spectra of both forms of the probe show a maximum emission at 590 nm for resorufin and a negligible fluorescence for resazurin. In agreement with Maeda et al (27), we found that 570 nm is the optimal excitation wavelength of resorufin, although 530 nm is commonly used (5,15,28,29).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Cell viability and cell counts were quantified using resazurin [7-Hydroxy-3H-phenoxazin-3-one 10-oxide] (Alamar Blue) indicator dye (34). A working solution of resazurin was prepared in sterile HBSS minus phenol red (0.5 mg/ml), and then added (15% v/v) to each sample.…”
Section: Hanksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No animal testing was performed for this study. Following the method described by Evans et al (2001), the lowest LD 50 value of a test chemical that 2) MEIC; Multicentre Evaluation of In Vitro Cytotoxicity (Ekwall et al 1983). …”
Section: Ld 50 Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in a previous report (Stobbe et al, 2003), the experimentally derived IC 50 and IC 35 were compared to the in vivo data for each of the 6 parameters (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, prevalence, positive predictability and negative predictability) ( Table 2). Evans et al (2001), the in vitro cut-off concentration corresponding to the in vivo oral cut-off point (2,000 mg/kg) was calculated from the regression equation to be 4,225 μg/mL (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Calculation Of Correlation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation