2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0923-4748(01)00033-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a justification tool for advanced manufacturing technologies: system-wide benefits value analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power of AHP has been validated by empirical application in diverse areas such as healthcare [16], planning [19,25], mining [14], project management [1], missile systems [7], new product development [1] and manufacturing [13]. In addition AHP has been used in making decisions that involve ranking, selection, evaluation, and selection of machines and IT based systems [4,10,20,22].To construct the hierarchy of objectives and attributes that allow establishing a prioritization scale an extended review of the related literature was conducted. This review focused on spare parts criticality aspects and the relationships between maintenance and logistics points of view.…”
Section: Multicriteria Decision Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power of AHP has been validated by empirical application in diverse areas such as healthcare [16], planning [19,25], mining [14], project management [1], missile systems [7], new product development [1] and manufacturing [13]. In addition AHP has been used in making decisions that involve ranking, selection, evaluation, and selection of machines and IT based systems [4,10,20,22].To construct the hierarchy of objectives and attributes that allow establishing a prioritization scale an extended review of the related literature was conducted. This review focused on spare parts criticality aspects and the relationships between maintenance and logistics points of view.…”
Section: Multicriteria Decision Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representative ones are: Abdel-Kader, et al, 2001;Agarwal, 1997;Boyer, et al, 1997;Canada, et al, 1989;Canada, et al, 1990;Choobineh, 1986;Datta, et al, 1992;Hynek, et al, 2007;Kaplan, 1986;Karsak, et al, 2001;Kumar, et al, 1996;Marri, et al, 2006;Meredith, et al, 1990;Meredith, et al, 1986;Naik, et al, 1992;Ordoobadi, et al, 2001;Primrose, 1991;Sambasivarao, et al, 1997;Slagmulder, et al, 1992;Small, 2006;Stainer, et al, 1996;Zammuto, et al, 1992.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Amsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Ross, 1995). Five main steps are involved in modeling a fuzzy expert system which is shown in Figure 1 (Ordoobadi & Mulvaney, 2001):…”
Section: Modeling Of Production Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%