2020
DOI: 10.1002/prp2.669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a machine learning algorithm for early detection of opioid use disorder

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 27 However, our prospective accuracy is comparable to or better than studies using hold-out validation and a similar case definition for OUD. Other studies included additional features such as lab tests and vital signs, 35 additional diagnostic phenotypes developed based on unsupervised learning, 36 and a larger quantity and broader spectrum of demographic and clinical features, 37 39 as well as utilizing advanced ML models such as decision trees, 37 39 gradient boosted trees 40 and deep neural network learning. 39 – 41 Our findings demonstrate that a ML model based on retrospective data can provide accurate predictions of individual OUD cases in a prospective sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 27 However, our prospective accuracy is comparable to or better than studies using hold-out validation and a similar case definition for OUD. Other studies included additional features such as lab tests and vital signs, 35 additional diagnostic phenotypes developed based on unsupervised learning, 36 and a larger quantity and broader spectrum of demographic and clinical features, 37 39 as well as utilizing advanced ML models such as decision trees, 37 39 gradient boosted trees 40 and deep neural network learning. 39 – 41 Our findings demonstrate that a ML model based on retrospective data can provide accurate predictions of individual OUD cases in a prospective sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to compare our results with some of the previous studies because existing literature on ML for opioid-related risk prediction is inconsistent and includes a varied array of models that predict similar but fundamentally different outcomes such as OUD, 25,35,36,[40][41][42][43] opioid misuse, 38,[44][45][46] and opioid overdose (See Tseregounis & Henry, 2021, for a review 47 ). Opioid misuse refers to the non-medical use of prescription opioids, for example, for euphoric effect.…”
Section: Predictive Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also one of the few models that predict a repeated, time-varying outcome (in contrast to events coded as 1-time, person-level reclassifications, such as OUD diagnosis or overdose. 36,41,42 Therefore, it is difficult to compare our model performance directly with that of other models. The study most similar to ours used urine drug data combined with basic demographic data from 139 OUD patients in a hospital-based outpatient buprenorphine program to predict relapse risk after 4 weeks of urine-validated opioid abstinence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, though machine learning (ML) methods have been used for analysis of OUD, these works do not consider fMRI signal analysis. The authors in [6] implement the Gradient Boosting trees algorithm using a commercial claims database for the analysis of patient overdose status. The work in [7] analyzes information from electronic health records to predict opioid substance dependence.…”
Section: Description Of Purposementioning
confidence: 99%