2011
DOI: 10.1504/ijhst.2011.040744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a macroinvertebrate-based Nepal Lake Biotic Index (NLBI): an applied method for assessing the ecological quality of lakes and reservoirs in Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the significant differences in the percentages of EPT and WL abundance among the three zones are apparent and are similar to those from other ecological studies (e.g. Shah et al 2011). The overall trend of reduced taxa richness and a shift from sensitive to tolerant taxa is an indication of multiple stressors (Norris and Georges 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, the significant differences in the percentages of EPT and WL abundance among the three zones are apparent and are similar to those from other ecological studies (e.g. Shah et al 2011). The overall trend of reduced taxa richness and a shift from sensitive to tolerant taxa is an indication of multiple stressors (Norris and Georges 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Spearman's rho correlation test was used to see the association between macro-invertebrate diversity, evenness and richness with physiochemical parameters. The water quality at each sampling site was assessed using Nepal Lake Biotic Index (Shah et al, 2011) which is computed as:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASPT score = total of BMWP score / total number of families represented; >6 clean water, 5-6 doubtful quality, 4-5 probable moderate pollution, <4 probable severe pollution (Mandaville, 2002). Lake water quality class and its degree of pollution: 0-1.99 bad (extremely); 2-3.99 poor (heavily); 4-4.90 fair (moderately); 4.91-6.09 good (slightly); 6.10-10 high (none to minimal) (Shah et al, 2011). pH (5.8-6.4), FCO 2 , EC, and TA values were found lower than in UP. Similar low values were also recorded in one wetland and oxbow lake of Cachar District (Laskar and Gupta, 2013;Gupta and Devi, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological monitoring working party (BMWP) scores and average score per taxon (ASPT) were analyzed following Mandaville (2002). The Nepal Lake Biotic Index (NLBI) was analyzed following Shah et al (2011). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%