Volume 1: Pipelines and Facilities Integrity 2016
DOI: 10.1115/ipc2016-64369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Magnetic Eddy Current In-Line Inspection Tool

Abstract: Pipeline in-line inspections (ILI) are one of the primary methods used to assess the integrity of operating oil and gas pipelines. Conventional ILI technology is based on ultrasonic testing (UT) or magnetic flux leakage (MFL) sensors. Although these technologies are suitable for most pipeline inspections, there remains an opportunity to expand ILI technology and application. ExxonMobil and Innospection Ltd. are working to develop a new ILI sensor technology based on a combination of Magnetic Eddy Current (MEC)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The synergy with the eddy current system means that greater distances can be inspected for a lower energy cost. 77,78 Acoustics Ultrasound inspection. In the context of subsea pipeline inspection, ultrasound refers to the use of elastic waves to detect and quantify damage.…”
Section: Electrical Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The synergy with the eddy current system means that greater distances can be inspected for a lower energy cost. 77,78 Acoustics Ultrasound inspection. In the context of subsea pipeline inspection, ultrasound refers to the use of elastic waves to detect and quantify damage.…”
Section: Electrical Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synergy with the eddy current system means that greater distances can be inspected for a lower energy cost. 77,78…”
Section: Sensing Strategies For Subsea Pipeline Shmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the most common electromagnetic inspection method for conducting elements, Eddy current testing has been widely applied in detecting surface defects, subsurface corrosion, and coating characterization of conductive materials [13][14][15]. In 1879, British engineer David Hughes utilized the eddy current effect to achieve the sorting of metallic materials, marking the first practical application of eddy current theory in engineering [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This greatly improved the signalto-noise ratio of detection signals and further promoted the engineering applications of eddy current testing, laying the foundation for modern conventional eddy current testing. With the continuous development of eddy current testing theory, materials science, and digital signal processing technology, various techniques have been developed, including multi-frequency eddy current testing, remote field eddy current testing (RFEC), eddy current array (ECA) testing, and pulsed eddy current testing (PEC) [13]. Currently, mature eddy current internal inspection equipment abroad includes the RoCorr IEC eddy current internal detector by ROSEN, the RoMat DMG magnetic leakage and eddy current composite internal detector, and the See Snake remote field eddy current internal detector developed by Russell [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has a deeper penetration depth than radiographic inspection technology, but usually needs to apply coupling agent on the surface, and it is not suitable for the detection of rough surface. Eddy current inspection is based on electromagnetic induction, and uses the secondary eddy current generated by the pipe wall to detect pipeline defects and weld seams [17][18][19][20]. However, due to the skin effect of ferromagnetic materials, the penetration depth decreases with the increase of excitation coil frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%