2011
DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2011.583267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a mandarin monosyllable test material with homogenous items (II): Lists equivalence evaluation

Abstract: Equivalence evaluation results indicated good psychophysical equivalence between the 10 lists except for list 2. List 9 has a reused item. After the elimination of lists 2 and 9, multivariate ANOVA revealed a good equivalence between the remaining eight lists (p = 0.136). The mean threshold of eight equivalent lists was 10.32 ± 0.38 dB HL, while the mean slope was 5.00 ± 0.29%/dB.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several Mandarin word test materials have been recently developed, with most using monosyllable words (Han et al, 2009; Ji et al, 2011; Tsai et al, 2009). For example, Han et al (2009) developed Mandarin monosyllabic speech test materials (MSTMs) for speech audiometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several Mandarin word test materials have been recently developed, with most using monosyllable words (Han et al, 2009; Ji et al, 2011; Tsai et al, 2009). For example, Han et al (2009) developed Mandarin monosyllabic speech test materials (MSTMs) for speech audiometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High reliability and validity are required when a psychophysical test method or system is applied in clinical practice (Ji et al, 2011;Gilbert et al, 2013). In this study, the hearing thresholds determined by the standard test and the self-test were compared in three independent experiments in normal-hearing participants and patients with SNHL, and their concordance was analyzed with the standard test as the gold standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speech discrimination testing was performed in a sound‐field open‐set condition using Mandarin test materials developed by Ji et al 11,12 Each test included 25 monosyllable words and 40 spondee words, with a sound intensity of 75 dB sound pressure level. The subject was seated at a distance of 1 m from the tester.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%