2018
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rry085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a markerless tumor-tracking algorithm using prior four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography

Abstract: Respiratory motion management is a huge challenge in radiation therapy. Respiratory motion induces temporal anatomic changes that distort the tumor volume and its position. In this study, a markerless tumor-tracking algorithm was investigated by performing phase recognition during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using four-dimensional cone-beam computer tomography (4D-CBCT) obtained at patient registration, and in-treatment cone-beam projection images. The data for 20 treatment sessions (five lung c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, 4D‐CBCT faced obstacles immediately from its onset, such as poor image quality and low contrast due to undersampling streaking artifacts, remediated with long acquisition times and high radiation doses to fulfill the required projection sampling. In order to address these challenges, investigators proposed different solutions such as using prior information, compressed sensing, motion modeling, deformable registration, and a large variety of other software reconstruction techniques to alleviate the lack of sufficient projection data within each phase bin 235–285 ; optimizing the gantry acquisition protocol specific to the patient respiration and/or fiducial markers to adequately sample the patient respiration while minimizing both scan time and dose 286–300 ; and even developing 4D digital tomosynthesis to get time‐resolved motion data in the most efficient manner, albeit at the expense of full volumetric information 301–305 …”
Section: Daily Image Guidance Of Lung Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 4D‐CBCT faced obstacles immediately from its onset, such as poor image quality and low contrast due to undersampling streaking artifacts, remediated with long acquisition times and high radiation doses to fulfill the required projection sampling. In order to address these challenges, investigators proposed different solutions such as using prior information, compressed sensing, motion modeling, deformable registration, and a large variety of other software reconstruction techniques to alleviate the lack of sufficient projection data within each phase bin 235–285 ; optimizing the gantry acquisition protocol specific to the patient respiration and/or fiducial markers to adequately sample the patient respiration while minimizing both scan time and dose 286–300 ; and even developing 4D digital tomosynthesis to get time‐resolved motion data in the most efficient manner, albeit at the expense of full volumetric information 301–305 …”
Section: Daily Image Guidance Of Lung Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, image processing techniques to detect tumor itself in kilovoltage [ 20 , 21 ] or megavoltage [ 22 , 23 ] images without the fiducial markers have been reported. It has also been reported that an anatomical feature such as the diaphragm could be used instead of the metal markers [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the invasive implantation remains a daunting barrier for its wide acceptance in the clinic. A markerless approach is highly desirable and has been investigated intensively . With highly customized image pre‐processing and enhancement maneuvers, localization through registration based on cross‐correlation is successful when image contrast between tumor and its background is reasonable, but often fails at angles where tumor is obscured by mediastinum or ribs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A markerless approach is highly desirable and has been investigated intensively. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] With highly customized image pre-processing and enhancement maneuvers, localization through registration based on cross-correlation is successful when image contrast between tumor and its background is reasonable, but often fails at angles where tumor is obscured by mediastinum or ribs. 18 A potential solution is a markerless tracking scenario, which explores the large body of data collected in the marker-based setting, builds a framework to extract underlining non-marker features inside the tumor among a population of lung patients, and uses this information as a prior to help the detection and tracking of tumor in subsequent patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%