Development of a mechanical weeder and experiment on the growth, yield and quality of rice

Abstract

Weed control in paddy fields is a worldwide problem and mechanical weeding will become a major weeding method in non-chemical weeding. A mechanical weeder was designed and tested to improve the efficiency of mechanical weeding and reduce the application of herbicides in this study. The weeding equipment is equipped with three sets of inter-row weeding parts which include ground-contoured-following pressing-grass float (GPF), weeding roller, and so on. The weeding principle of weeding part is that the weeding equipment enters the inter-row area with weeder moving forward, then the GPF overwhelms the weeds in the inter-row area to improve the probability that the weeding roller behind the GPF pressed the overwhelmed weeds into the soil. The effects of weeding methods on the plant height, grain yield and quality attributes were investigated in a two-seasonal field experiment. Three weeding methods were applied in the present study: no-weeding, chemical weeding and mechanical weeding. The results of the two-seasonal field experiment showed that the average weeding rates of mechanical weeders were 87.10% and 87.61% respectively. In both seasons, there was no significant difference among weeding methods on plant height at the early growth stage of rice after weeding, but weeding methods had significant effect on plant height at the late growth stage. The plant height of mechanical weeding was higher at the late growth stage. Weeding methods had significant effects on grain yield, grain number per panicle, seed-setting rate, 1000-grain weight and shoot dry matter accumulation (p<0.05), however there was no remarkable effect on rice quality and other attributes (p>0.05). Grain yield of mechanical weeding was significantly higher than that of no-weeding. There was no significant difference between chemical weeding and mechanical weeding. It can be concluded from the two-seasonal experiment that mechanical weeding had the same effect as chemical weeding on grain yield and rice quality.

Development and Experimentation of Intra-Row Weeding Device for Organic Rice

“…The weeding time was 15 days after transplanting. The intra-row weeding device was installed on the mechanical weeder for organic rice that was composed of the walking platform and inter-row weeding device [29], as shown in Figure 7. The walking platform included the walking system, floating mechanism, steering mechanism, and control system, and it adopted front-wheel steering and four-wheel drive to walk across two rows of rice, and forward, backward, and steering movement was operated via remote control.…”

Design and Experiment of a Biomimetic Duckbill-like Vibration Chain for Physical Weed Control during the Rice Tillering Stage

“…In order to accurately evaluate the operational performance of the bio-inspired vibration chain weeding device, the weed removal rate and rice seedling damage are two important evaluation indicators for assessing the weeding machinery, according to relevant research methods [ 21 ]. The weed removal rate was statistically analyzed on the day of weeding and on the 7th day after weeding.…”

“…Tang et al designed a weeding wheel with rake teeth to bury the weeds between the rice rows [ 20 ]. Jiao et al designed a weeding roller with spirals to press the weeds between the rice rows into the soil, achieving the same effect as chemical weeding [ 21 ]. However, these weeding methods inevitably have issues such as damaging rice seedlings and crushing them.…”

Mechanical Weed Control Systems: Methods and Effectiveness

“…Vision systems are used to detect plants and correct weeding tools, enabling faster driving of a tractor or an autonomous platform, e.g., CultiCam, Garford, K.U.L.T., Steketee, FarmDroid, Robovator, etc. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. There are also other weeding methods based on the visual recognition of weeds and burning them with a laser beam.…”