2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Microfluidic Open Interface with Flow Isolated Desorption Volume for the Direct Coupling of SPME Devices to Mass Spectrometry

Abstract: Technologies that efficiently integrate the sampling and sample preparation steps with direct introduction to mass spectrometry (MS), providing simple and sensitive analytical workflows as well as capabilities for automation, can generate a great impact in a vast variety of fields, such as in clinical, environmental, and food-science applications. In this study, a novel approach that facilitates direct coupling of Bio-SPME devices to MS using a microfluidic design is presented. This technology, named microflui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30 Tascon et al quantified immunosuppressants in whole blood at the sub-ppb level with a microfluidic open interface (MOI) ionization source. 31 Coated blade spray 32 (CBS) was also used for the quantification od drugs of abuse in human urine and plasma. These techniques, namely OPP, MOI, and CBS, represent a viable alternative to DBDI when an ESI-like ionization is preferred.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Tascon et al quantified immunosuppressants in whole blood at the sub-ppb level with a microfluidic open interface (MOI) ionization source. 31 Coated blade spray 32 (CBS) was also used for the quantification od drugs of abuse in human urine and plasma. These techniques, namely OPP, MOI, and CBS, represent a viable alternative to DBDI when an ESI-like ionization is preferred.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes extraction and desorption time. This is comparable to other SPME‐AIMS technologies like coated blade spray (CBS) (29 s) and open port probe (15–20 s). In paper spray, drying time (minutes, in some cases hours) and spraying times (seconds to minutes) tend to vary with applications, but total analysis times usually are not excessively long.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPME is renowned for its structural flexibility, as its format can be re-shaped in order to comply with the requirements of varying direct-to-MS approaches. [23][24][25][26][27][28] SPME uses an open-bed format 29 that works by directly exposing the sampling device, which consists of an extractive phase (coating) that has been immobilized onto a selected substrate, to a matrix of interest. SPME sampling only extracts a fraction of analyte, and the use of biocompatible protective coatings, such as polyacrylonitrile (PAN), helps to prevent the adherence of unwanted biologicals (reducing clogging issues and artifact formations), thus enabling a "cleaner" introduction of the sample into the mass spectrometer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other options include but are not limited to direct analysis in real time (DART) [63][64][65], atmospheric pressure photon ionization (APPI) [66], and thermal desorption-electrospray ionization (TD-ESI) [67]. It is anticipated that SPME Arrow-like geometries [11] compatible with liquid desorption and complex biological matrices will be developed in the near future and potentially coupled to direct-to-MS technologies such nano-electrospray ionization (nano-ESI) [68], desorption electrospray ionization [69], and the microfluidic open interface (also known as Open Probe Sampling Interface, OPSI) [70][71][72], as means to enhance the speed of analysis and the sensitivity [73]. Areas where such devices can make a great impact include but are not limited to, food fraud [74], volatomics [64], and rapid screening in the clinical chemistry realm [75].…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%