Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium, 2006.
DOI: 10.1109/sas.2006.1634243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a minimal IEEE 1451.1 model for microcontroller implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of the suggested mechanism with the reported implementations of the IEEE 1451 system (see e.g. Cummins et al (1998) and Stepanenko et al (2006)) shows that the suggested mechanism allows reduction of the required microcontroller code amount by more than 90%, while at the same time allowing exclusion of additional components (such as memory blocks for storing TEDS or additional processing devices for implementing additional smart features). In addition, the evaluation of the suggested P&P mechanism showed that it makes the initial WSN node program independent of the connected sensors -all of the required sensor drivers are retrieved automatically from the WSN by the node after start-up and peripheral identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The comparison of the suggested mechanism with the reported implementations of the IEEE 1451 system (see e.g. Cummins et al (1998) and Stepanenko et al (2006)) shows that the suggested mechanism allows reduction of the required microcontroller code amount by more than 90%, while at the same time allowing exclusion of additional components (such as memory blocks for storing TEDS or additional processing devices for implementing additional smart features). In addition, the evaluation of the suggested P&P mechanism showed that it makes the initial WSN node program independent of the connected sensors -all of the required sensor drivers are retrieved automatically from the WSN by the node after start-up and peripheral identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It will increase the computing complexity of the system. This problem was actual in the time of development of mentioned sound metric stations but modern computers and communication technologies provides A-168 automation all measurement and computing functions [22], which are required in sound ranging implementation, including: topographic binding, acoustic environment monitoring, communication between components of the system [23] as well as data aggregation using any algorithm of data processing in real time mode [24] and reprogramming on operating program using active communication interface during operation [25]. These publications are not connected to sound ranging but they consider appropriate aspects of distributive DAQ systems development.…”
Section: The Sound Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that several referent IEEE 1451.1 compatible network processor implementations are reported in the literature. [25][26][27][28][29] Based on the Plug and Play Geiger-Muller detector, a monitoring network can be established. Detectors can be distributed over a wide area and accessed over the network to perform a transfer of requested measurement results.…”
Section: Implementation Of Plug and Play Geiger-muller Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%