2019
DOI: 10.1080/25726668.2019.1586371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a model for economic control of loading in sublevel caving mines

Abstract: This paper presents an economic model for optimizing loading at the draw point in sublevel caving (SLC) operations. The input data consist of estimated bucket grades based on bucket weights from Load Haul Dump machines. This information, together with average operational mining costs, was used to create an economic model providing a real-time economic assessment of the draw point performance for SLC rings. The results demonstrate the importance of continuous draw point monitoring to optimize SLC operations. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The field tests were performed at LKAB's Malmberget mine, the second largest underground iron ore mine in the world (Shekhar et al 2019). It is located in Gällivare municipality in northern Sweden.…”
Section: Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field tests were performed at LKAB's Malmberget mine, the second largest underground iron ore mine in the world (Shekhar et al 2019). It is located in Gällivare municipality in northern Sweden.…”
Section: Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iron content of pure magnetite ore is 72.36% and that of pure hematite ore is 69.90% [11,12]. In the grade control system, the percentage of the iron ore inside the LHD bucket is assumed to be 71% [12] even though it slightly differs from the theoretical values of pure magnetite and hematite. The grade control system used in both mines uses the density difference between the ore and waste [13].…”
Section: Current Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general trend is for the waste rock proportion to increase with the extraction ratio, the latter defined as the total weight of material removed from a drawpoint of a blasted ring divided by the planned tonnage calculated from the ring geometry (Shekhar, 2018). However, it can vary considerably between successive LHD bucket loads (Shekhar et al, 2019) and factors such as the ring geometry and composition of caved rock from the adjacent production area above. If waste rock dilution exceeds a certain level, the material becomes uneconomical to process.…”
Section: Impact Of Waste Rock On the Mining Processmentioning
confidence: 99%