1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00960495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a modified treatment evaluation inventory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
277
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(285 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
277
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Treatment Evaluation Questionnaire (TEQ; Kelley, Heffer, Gresham, & Elliott, 1989) was given at the end of treatment and at the three-month follow-up to gather parent satisfaction ratings of IBTSM. The TEQ contains 21 items with three subscales pertaining to Acceptability (11 items), Effectiveness (8 items), and Time Required (2 items).…”
Section: Treatment Acceptabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Treatment Evaluation Questionnaire (TEQ; Kelley, Heffer, Gresham, & Elliott, 1989) was given at the end of treatment and at the three-month follow-up to gather parent satisfaction ratings of IBTSM. The TEQ contains 21 items with three subscales pertaining to Acceptability (11 items), Effectiveness (8 items), and Time Required (2 items).…”
Section: Treatment Acceptabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TEI-SF (Kelley, Heffer, Gresham, & Elliott, 1989) is a 9-item scale that measures acceptability of treatment. The highest possible score is 45, and a score greater than 27 suggests an acceptable treatment.…”
Section: Social Validity Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parents of the participants completed the TEI-SF at baseline following a description of the procedures, during each new treatment phase, and at posttreatment. The TEI-SF has good internal consistency (alpha 5 .85) and is considered to be a valid measure of treatment acceptability (Kelley et al, 1989).…”
Section: Social Validity Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 9-item physical functioning and 6-item depression subscales were used in this study. The physical functioning and depression subscales have demonstrated adequate reliability and validity for youth with chronic pain (Eccleston et al, 2005).Treatment Satisfaction-Parents completed a modified version of the Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form (Kelley, Heffer, Gresham, & Elliot, 1989). This is a 9-item scale regarding satisfaction with the therapeutic process during the course of treatment and satisfaction with the outcome of therapy, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a 9-item scale regarding satisfaction with the therapeutic process during the course of treatment and satisfaction with the outcome of therapy, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. This measure has demonstrated good reliability and validity (Kelley et al, 1989).Therapist Records-We collected feasibility data including scheduling information (e.g., show rate, rescheduled visits), therapist records, and session worksheets. Each session, therapists rated parents' motivation to learn, receptivity to learning, understanding of the therapy process, completion of homework, and rapport using 0-10 scales (0 = low, 10 = high).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%