2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a multi-matrix LC–MS/MS method for urea quantitation and its application in human respiratory disease studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most methods for measuring urea rely on LC-MS 47 and HPLC, 48 NMR, 49 or electrochemical techniques. [50][51][52] Commercially available urea colorimetric assay kits operate over a range of concentrations (0.01-0.1 mM) that is too low for evaluation of sweat.…”
Section: Quantitative Colorimetric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most methods for measuring urea rely on LC-MS 47 and HPLC, 48 NMR, 49 or electrochemical techniques. [50][51][52] Commercially available urea colorimetric assay kits operate over a range of concentrations (0.01-0.1 mM) that is too low for evaluation of sweat.…”
Section: Quantitative Colorimetric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assay achieved high sensitivity with reported LLOQ for kinin peptide quantification in NLF of 1.9 pmol/L. Therefore, the approach reported herein is the first description of quantitative biotherapeutic bioanalysis in NLF using a hybrid LBA-LC-MS/MS method with concentration normalization via urea correlation (described elsewhere). ,, …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, the approach reported herein is the first description of quantitative biotherapeutic bioanalysis in NLF using a hybrid LBA-LC-MS/MS method with concentration normalization via urea correlation (described elsewhere). 12,13,44 In order to ensure the method was applicable to a very broad patient population, we carefully evaluated various factors that could contribute to interferences and matrix effects. Method performance was not affected by the presence of soluble RBD capture reagent to analyte ratios of up to 9-fold, thus ensuring sufficient capture capacity.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most effective calibration approach to minimize MEs is through the use of a structural or stable isotope labelled (SIL) internal standard (IS), where the analyte of interest and the IS should undergo the same procedure(s). Recently, Whang and coworkers developed a multi-matrix LC-MS/MS method for the determination of urea in plasma in the context of human respiratory diseases 121 . Two stable-isotope-labelled urea isotopologues, [ 15 N2]-urea and [ 13 C, 15 N2]-urea, were used as the surrogate analyte and the internal standard, respectively, providing the best measurement consistency across different matrices.…”
Section: Matrix Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%