1997
DOI: 10.1021/ac970121q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Nanoscale Liquid Chromatography/Electrospray Mass Spectrometry Methodology for the Detection and Identification of DNA Adducts

Abstract: In this work, the coupling of liquid nanochromatography to NanoFlow electrospray mass spectrometry was evaluated for the detection of DNA adducts. The NanoFlow ES LC/MS system was compared with the capillary and conventional ES LC/MS system by analyzing an in vitro reaction mixture resulting from the interaction of 2'-deoxyguanosine 5'-monophosphate with bisphenol A diglycidyl ether and by injecting 2'-deoxyadenosine. By using NanoFlow ES LC/MS, the mass sensitivity could be improved by a factor of 3300. Three… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent of the development of LC-MS for DNA adduct detection can be gauged by the increasing number of publications where DNA adducts have been determined in human tissues and urine (92,121,131,132,173,174,180,(183)(184)(185)(186)(187). In terms of future developments for increasing the sensitivity of LC-MS, the introduction of capillary and nano capillary LC (to replace the normally employed narrow bore and microbore LC) coupled to micro-or nanoelectrospray ionization-MS has the potential to increase detection limits and sensitivity of DNA adduct analysis (188)(189)(190). Vanhoutte et al observed an improvement in sensitivity by a factor of 3300 for the detection of 2 0 -deoxyguanosine 5 0 -monophosphate adducts of bisphenol A diglycidyl ether using nano capillary LC when compared with conventional LC (189).…”
Section: Analytical Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of the development of LC-MS for DNA adduct detection can be gauged by the increasing number of publications where DNA adducts have been determined in human tissues and urine (92,121,131,132,173,174,180,(183)(184)(185)(186)(187). In terms of future developments for increasing the sensitivity of LC-MS, the introduction of capillary and nano capillary LC (to replace the normally employed narrow bore and microbore LC) coupled to micro-or nanoelectrospray ionization-MS has the potential to increase detection limits and sensitivity of DNA adduct analysis (188)(189)(190). Vanhoutte et al observed an improvement in sensitivity by a factor of 3300 for the detection of 2 0 -deoxyguanosine 5 0 -monophosphate adducts of bisphenol A diglycidyl ether using nano capillary LC when compared with conventional LC (189).…”
Section: Analytical Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling of a miniaturized 2-DLC system to tandem mass spectrometry is a powerful approach enabling the analysis of low quantities of DNA-adducts present in a matrix of mainly unmodified 2'-deoxynucleosides [33,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Lc-ms Analysis Of Standard Dna Adductsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these purposes, several analytical techniques are used, such as high-performance chromatography (HPLC) in combination with fluorescence detection, 1,2 32 P post-labeling 3 -5 and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). 6,7 Recently, it has been demonstrated by us and others that electrospray mass spectrometry (ES-MS) and electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (ES-MS/MS) if coupled to capillary 8 or nano-HPLC 9 or capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) 10 offers a unique analytical tool capable of analyzing DNA adducts at the nucleoside or even the nucleotide level. Furthermore, it should be emphasized that ES-MS/MS provides important structural information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After filtration (0.2 µm) the aqueous solutions was used for analysis. 9 Under these conditions, the adducts were retained. Unmodified nucleosides were washed from the precolumn after 1 min, after which the adducts were backflushed to the analytical column at a flow-rate of 5 µl min 1 starting with an isocratic development using MeOH/0.01 M NH 4 OAc (35 : 65) for 10 min followed by a linear gradient to MeOH/0.01 M NH 4 OAc (90 : 10) over 5 min.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%